It doesn't take a whole lot of logic to realize the poverty of that statement.
If Christ died for a man and paid for every one of his sins and cleansed that man of his transgressions with His blood, and that man STILL burns in hell, just what does that say about the efficacy and strength of Christ's sacrifice?
It's a ludicrous argument. Christ's blood was sufficient for all the world, but efficient for only those who are His.
Wash me throughly from mine iniquity, and cleanse me from my sin." -- Psalms 51:1-2"Have mercy upon me, O God, according to thy lovingkindness: according unto the multitude of thy tender mercies blot out my transgressions.
"Wash me thoroughly." Not conditionally. Not partially. Not temporally. "Thoroughly."
"She is not afraid of the snow for her household: for all her household are clothed with scarlet." -- Proverbs 31:21
Shall I worry? Is my household clothed with the blood of Christ or not?
It says that the Man in Hell used his "free will" not to fully accept Christ's sacrifice.
When we love God surpassingly above all else - we will believe Him and learn to trust Him, realizing that the blood of Christ is enough, that God knows every thing every where and every when, that we need not fear anyone or anything being able to pluck us from His safekeeping.
Then, we can truly "let go" and "let God." (Romans 8, I Cor 2, John 15-21 et al)