Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: P-Marlowe
Biological evidence shows that there was no resurrection

You are changing the subject. I didn't say Flood is not possible, just that no evidence shows that there was a world-wide flood.

2,654 posted on 08/18/2007 12:33:07 AM PDT by kosta50 (Eastern Orthodoxy is pure Christianity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2652 | View Replies ]


To: kosta50
I didn't say Flood is not possible, just that no evidence shows that there was a world-wide flood.

No you dismiss it because there is no verifiable evidence. You dismiss the Exodus because there is no verifiable evidence. You dismiss much of what Jesus attested to because there is no verifiable evidence.

But there is certainly no verifiable evidence of the existence of Christ, much less his virgin birth or his miracles or his resurrection.

Frankly kosta, I really don't know what you believe other than that your church is the only true church and that it alone is somehow infallible.

On what basis do you claim the infallibility of your church?

2,656 posted on 08/18/2007 1:05:38 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2654 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson