Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Ping-Pong
It is amazing. The Apostle Paul says Eve was "Wholly seduced" by Satan [II Corinthians 11:2-3]. The Apostle John says "Cain was of the wicked one" [I John 3:12]. [Genesis 3;13] Eve tells The Lord that Satan seduced her. [Genesis 3:15] speaks of Satan's seed and Eve's seed. [Genesis 3:16] speaks of Eve's conception and pregnancy.

Finally, in [Genesis 4:1]......Adam knew his wife!

But.....according to the experts......there is nothing to suggest Cain was not Adam's son.........!

Just what does it take to unwind centuries of mainstream false tradition?

I won't mention that Cain is never found in Adam's genealogy.

2,498 posted on 08/14/2007 5:06:57 PM PDT by Diego1618
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2497 | View Replies ]


To: Diego1618; Ping-Pong; xzins; P-Marlowe; nobdysfool; Dr. Eckleburg
It is amazing. The Apostle Paul says Eve was "Wholly seduced" by Satan [II Corinthians 11:2-3].

It is begging the question to claim that this means Satan had sex with Eve.

The Apostle John says "Cain was of the wicked one" [I John 3:12].

The context clearly presents this in terms of association, not procreation.

[Genesis 3;13] Eve tells The Lord that Satan seduced her.

Again, it is begging the question to claim that this means Satan had sex with Eve.

[Genesis 3:15] speaks of Satan's seed and Eve's seed.

A term used not exclusively of biological procreation but also spiritual decendance.

[Genesis 3:16] speaks of Eve's conception and pregnancy.

And as shown the logic behind a claim of paternal twins is purely inductive and highly improbable.

Finally, in [Genesis 4:1]......Adam knew his wife!

And together they produced Cain and Abel.

But.....according to the experts......there is nothing to suggest Cain was not Adam's son.........!

According to Scripture and plain reason there is nothing to suggest or support your errant position.

Just what does it take to unwind centuries of mainstream false tradition?

The intervention of the Holy Spirit, and hopefully your false tradition will indeed be unwound soon.

I won't mention that Cain is never found in Adam's genealogy.

You already did and it has already been addressed.

mene mene tekel upharsin

2,520 posted on 08/15/2007 6:31:00 AM PDT by Frumanchu (Jerry Falwell: Now a Calvinist in Glory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2498 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson