[colorcountry]

There is one final authority. He set down the standards in a Book. The State Medical board references this Book when determining the standards of licensing.

My family “doctor” consults a different book which he says has MORE authority. Therefore the Board (who adheres to the final authority’s “Book”) is authorized to make a determination.

The determination wasn't unanimous, but in the case of this particular doctor, it has been determined by a vast majority that my doctor is indeed a fraudulent quack. You however are free to consult with him regarding your health. It is your right....as long as he doesn't call himself a doctor and hang a fallacious certificate in order to deceive you. As long as he does this, he is subject to censure.

[caseinpoint]

Well, if you want to determine truth based on majority vote, go for it, but don’t presume to call a “doctor” that doesn’t meet your standards fraudulent.