Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: DelphiUser

Delphi if you take the time to go back to the post that wita was referring to, you will see that I said God was supposedly the physical father of Jesus through artificial insemination or other transmission that we might not understand.

I am surprised and shocked that you misunderstnad something that I clearly posted only days ago on this very thread. SHOCKED, I tell you.

So obviously if you are mistaken about this simple thing, you are mistaken and wrong about every other thing you ever have said or will say about me......Why you, you anti-colorcountry, you!

{said tongue in cheek - - if you could not tell]


1,060 posted on 07/13/2007 9:35:29 AM PDT by colorcountry (To pursue union at the expense of truth is treason to the Lord Jesus. - Charles Haddon Spurgeon -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1058 | View Replies ]


To: colorcountry
I went, I saw, I linked the post it think you were talking about.

I stand by my post, Mary is not God's wife, she is joseph's. Some times she will be spoken of as God's wife but that is because they are both the parents of Jesus, and it's kind of a unique position, but in the eternities, she will be joseph's wife.

The fahtering of Jesus was not an act of Sex because Mary was still a virgin when Jesus was born.

{said tongue in cheek - - if you could not tell}

Just remember to remove tounge from cheek before chewing, I forgot that once...
1,069 posted on 07/13/2007 11:17:55 AM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1060 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson