Posted on 05/21/2007 5:10:02 PM PDT by streetpreacher
Well, neither can I “prove” otherwise, but can make a far better case for God than can some aesthete atheist by clamming up.
I actually think Kirk did okay, except when he pulled out some cheesy graphics from their tracts like “Crocoduck”, “Bull-frog”, etc.
I think the biggest problem with Ray is he didn’t keep his end of the bargain. He didn’t “prove God scientifically” and he appealed to the Word. He basically just used his routine schtick. The whole Coke can argument, then the Ten Commandments.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.