1 posted on
02/17/2007 6:15:38 PM PST by
sionnsar
To: sionnsar
The problem with scenario #2 is that it requires direct or indirect communion with heretics. For three years or so I have been reading these threads and I still fail to understand the Anglican tolerance for heresy in its midst.
2 posted on
02/17/2007 6:41:47 PM PST by
Kolokotronis
(Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated!)
To: ahadams2; Way4Him; Peach; Zippo44; piperpilot; ex-Texan; ableLight; rogue yam; neodad; Tribemike; ..
Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder
Arlin Adams.
FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this moderately high-volume ping list (typically 3-9 pings/day).
This list is pinged by
sionnsar,
Huber and
newheart.
Resource for Traditional Anglicans:
http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com More Anglican articles
here.
Humor:
The Anglican Blue (by Huber)
Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15
3 posted on
02/17/2007 6:45:03 PM PST by
sionnsar
(†trad-anglican.faithweb.com†|Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
To: sionnsar
In Old High Griswoldian, that usually meant that whoever disagreed with him was a coward. There was some basis for him reaching that conclusion.
6 posted on
02/17/2007 7:27:55 PM PST by
PAR35
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson