Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why the Reformers Read the Fathers [Calvinist/Reformed Caucus thread]
Christianity Today ^ | 2003 | Christopher A. Hall

Posted on 02/10/2007 7:44:52 PM PST by Alex Murphy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last
To: Alex Murphy; Enosh; rrc; Pyro7480

For the benefit of those unfamiliar with Calvin and the other reformers, it would be interesting and beneficial to show the comparatives between the writings of the Early Church Fathers and the Reformers, much like I did on the ECF threads. Thanks.


21 posted on 02/11/2007 5:32:03 AM PST by NYer ("Where the bishop is present, there is the Catholic Church" - Ignatius of Antioch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480; Enosh

"I was just taken aback by Kolo's posts on this thread."

Why so? I am always happy when people read, or are advised to read, the Fathers! I have noticed, over the past say 5 or 6 years, that there is an increasing interest in patristics among Protestants, especially in their theological seminaries. Of course that doesn't mean they are all going to run off and become Orthodox, but it does mean that they will better understand what Orthodoxy is saying.


22 posted on 02/11/2007 6:32:56 AM PST by Kolokotronis (Christ is Risen, and you, o death, are annihilated!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy; Pyro7480; Kolokotronis

This is why a brother in Christ of mine, a conservative Baptist type once told me of his attitudes towards Protestants from Anglicans to Presbyterians "...the past churches would split out of denominations because they were hearing things that were against the word of God. Sometimes they would keep ideas and just reform them. The hooks left in the jaw of the protestant churches in their reform are the very same hooks that are drawing them back to the RCC[and Orthodox church]... They [mainline Protestants] cannot understand us because they were never of us. Anabaptist were on the outside of the RCC while the RCC is their mother. It is no wonder they understand her."


23 posted on 02/12/2007 5:20:15 AM PST by NZerFromHK (The US Founding is what makes Britain and USA separated by much more than a common language.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NZerFromHK; Alex Murphy
They [mainline Protestants] cannot understand us because they were never of us.

That is quite a claim, especially in light of the article that began this thread. Did you read it? Think it's at all possible we've taken the position we have, because we understand you only too well?

24 posted on 02/13/2007 10:16:03 AM PST by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-24 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson