[I highly recommend reading the comments (141 of them thus far) at the link. Here are a couple of the first, before the fun really begins: --sionnsar] I looked at the .pdf communion service. This looks like a very good effort indeed. How wonderful it would be for all believing Anglicans to have, once again, truly Common Prayer. Posted by Katherine on 01-19-2007 at 08:50 AM [link]
Not to spoil the party, but I am just so tired of contemporary language prayer books. I wasnt in the fray of 1979, but this wont win the hearts and minds of those who fought that prayer book wars in 70s.
A bad decision no matter how many orders are being placed. If you want a 1662, buy one from Cambridge University Press.
Posted by henryleroi on 01-19-2007 at 09:04 AM [link]
1 posted on
01/20/2007 6:37:23 PM PST by
sionnsar
To: ahadams2; Way4Him; Peach; Zippo44; piperpilot; ex-Texan; ableLight; rogue yam; neodad; Tribemike; ..
Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder
Arlin Adams.
FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this moderately high-volume ping list (typically 3-9 pings/day).
This list is pinged by
sionnsar,
Huber and
newheart.
Resource for Traditional Anglicans:
http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com More Anglican articles
here.
Humor:
The Anglican Blue (by Huber)
Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15
2 posted on
01/20/2007 6:38:11 PM PST by
sionnsar
(†trad-anglican.faithweb.com†|Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
To: sionnsar
If this was what had been offered in 1979, there would probably not have been too much fuss. Still, if a thing ain't broke, no reason to keep messin' with it till it is.
14 posted on
01/20/2007 11:26:16 PM PST by
beelzepug
(the Nikonoclast)
To: sionnsar
I'm not understanding why the BCP again needs "adjusting". There is too much temptation to "correct" this or that. The 1662 stood alone in England for almost 350 years, but this generation must, as they have done with every other institution, tear down and rebuild in their own image.
I suspect that the objective to modernize the language is just an excuse.
I will always be skeptical of any religious thought post 1960. Until another generation that is less agenda driven arrives let's keep historic edition. It really is not difficult to understand -- listen to any of the services at St. Thomas.
http://www.saintthomaschurch.org/Stream.html
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson