Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Rhadaghast

Thanks, the article was so poor and so lacking in truth, that I did not bother to go over it all. Of course, it was not an angel in the Burning Bush. Thanks for trying to help this poor writer.


14 posted on 12/10/2006 7:52:33 AM PST by tessalu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: tessalu
Angelology is one of my hobbies. I have worked both sides of the fence on that topic, and am very unforgiving of people that do not do their home work. Especially a priest who should know better.

I would like to know the actual Catholic teaching on some of these points. I have my doubts as to if all of the points in this article are actual teachings of catholicism.

I had read in a previous post regarding angels that catholic teaching considers The Angel that appeared to Joshua as an angel. That Angel accepted Joshua's worship. That clearly indicates that it is not an Angel, but the preincarnate Christ.

This is obviously a point that would fly in the face of the very nature of God if this were an angel.

I would like the RCC to be intellectually honest regarding these simple points. Consistency seems to be a short coming there and other places.
17 posted on 12/10/2006 10:17:53 AM PST by Rhadaghast (Yeshua haMashiach hu Adonai Tsidkenu)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson