Replies

The "Latin" Mass has never been removed so it does not need to be restored. It is said every day all over the world. What is being speculated, is that the Pope may remove the requirement for the bishopric indult. This is nothing new, it's been talked about since his election, due to his own expressed love for the Tridentine Mass and his now-famous comments on the faithful's right to participate in it.

Most American bishops do not grant permission, or do so very sparingly, for priests to say a "Latin" Mass. What people want who like the Latin or Tridentine masses (two different things), is for the bishops not to have such extensive power to prevent priests from offering these masses at their discretion, provided the Novus Ordo is available. This is the sort of change that can take years to make, it is fraught with ramifications of all kinds.

I personally can see how there needs to be some restriction on the Tridentine Rite, although it should be much more freely said than it is now, but because the Novus Ordo is the current approved rite and is said in every vernacular, I don't see why a priest could say a Mass in Latin at his own discretion.

After all, he can dedide to offer Mass in Spanish, Vietnamese, whatever, without authorization from the bishop, so why not the language of the Church? Overall, I don't believe Latin is the big problem, it's the American bishops opposition (or as my bishop recently put it, "discomfort") with the Tridentine Rite.