Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bending the Map: Schori is Betraying Gays and Lesbians
Stand Firm ^ | 11/02/2006 | Greg Griffith

Posted on 11/02/2006 5:47:45 PM PST by sionnsar

Someone named Bob Buchanan, running a blog called "Queer Christianity," is in a terrible snit:


The Associated Press reported today that Katherine Jefferts-Schori, newly installed Presiding Bishop the Episcopal Church supports the moratorium on new gay bishops and official liturgies to bless same-sex couples. She was installed last Saturday at the National Cathedral. She says it makes her “very sad” to do so, but she says “for the health of the larger body we have to do that for a season.” Personally, I think she and her cohorts are full of ####. That’s probably an understatement.
...
It is repugnant to anyone who truly understands the Gospel to maintain ties and fellowship with people (like some African Primates who are currently angry with the Episcopal Church) who endorse the murder of people because of their sexual attraction to someone of the same gender.

The Episcopal Church and Jefferts-Schori are more interested in maintaining fellowship with murderers than with gays and lesbians. Something is wrong with that picture. Bishop Jefferts-Schori claims to be a friend of sexual minorities, but she obviously is talking out of both sides of her mouth. How much more inconsistent can you be? Fundamentalists have taken over the U.S. government for the past six years; do we have to allow them to stop any progress in the Episcopal Church as well?

And here I thought we Episcopal knuckle-draggers were actually declining in power and numbers. Silly me...

Who will stand up for sexual minorities in lands where the crime of being true to one’s self is punished by torture or death? I gave up on Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams since the last Episcopal Convention because he has distanced himself moiré and more from the U.S. and Canadian Church. I have little confidence that Presiding Bishop Jeffri-Schori offers any hope at all.

Folks, when you think Katharine Jefferts Schori isn't helping gays make "progress" in the Episcopal Church, you're definitely bending the map.


TOPICS: Mainline Protestant; Other non-Christian
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 11/02/2006 5:47:47 PM PST by sionnsar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ahadams2; cf_river_rat; fgoodwin; secret garden; MountainMenace; SICSEMPERTYRANNUS; kaibabbob; ...
Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder Arlin Adams.

FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this moderately high-volume ping list (typically 3-9 pings/day).
This list is pinged by sionnsar, Huber and newheart.

Resource for Traditional Anglicans: http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com
More Anglican articles here.

Humor: The Anglican Blue (by Huber)

Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15

2 posted on 11/02/2006 5:48:20 PM PST by sionnsar (†trad-anglican.faithweb.com†|Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

I thought the Archbishop of Canterbury was Rowan Atkinson.

Seriously, the Episcopal church was founded to promote and permit sexual immorality in the chosen few. Queen Elizabeth the first was the product of such immoral congress, and locked in the Church of England (Ireland, Scotland, ect) as an established church for the next 700 years.

Just who are the chosen few has changed, but if you believe the stories about Richard I and James II, it hasn't changed that much.


3 posted on 11/02/2006 7:27:28 PM PST by donmeaker (If the sky don't say "Surrender Dorothy!" then my ex wife is out of town.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
Well, I guess if you're gonna be ignorant, you might as well go whole-hog stupid.

Look up Thomas Cranmer, and see if he really died as he did, just for sex.

4 posted on 11/02/2006 7:44:54 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
Queen Elizabeth the first was the product of such immoral congress, and locked in the Church of England (Ireland, Scotland, ect) as an established church for the next 700 years.

Does that mean we're living in 2258?

5 posted on 11/02/2006 9:21:09 PM PST by Huber ("Tradition means giving votes to the most obscure of classes - our ancestors." - G K Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar; All
"...She was installed last Saturday.." ??????

So now they're writing the news IN ADVANCE

6 posted on 11/03/2006 6:06:53 AM PST by ken5050
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar
It is repugnant to anyone who truly understands the Gospel to maintain ties and fellowship with people (like some African Primates who are currently angry with the Episcopal Church) who endorse the murder of people because of their sexual attraction to someone of the same gender.

What? What? Who endorsed murdering homosexuals? This has got to be hype.

Who will stand up for sexual minorities in lands where the crime of being true to one’s self is punished by torture or death?

I thought the idea was to be true to the Gospel even unto death, not one's own sinful nature.

7 posted on 11/03/2006 6:17:42 AM PST by RonF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
if you believe the stories about Richard I and James II, it hasn't changed that much.

I'm the last person to defend TEC, but I don't think you really mean James II, who lost his throne and was kicked out of Britain for being Roman Catholic.

Are you Roman as well? The charge of the Anglican Church being founded in order to give license to sexual immorality is usually leveled by Romans.

8 posted on 11/03/2006 6:29:04 PM PST by Martin Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Martin Tell

I am of no religion.

So, you think that Henry's liason with Anne Bolyn was strictly on the up and up?


9 posted on 11/04/2006 7:20:22 AM PST by donmeaker (If the sky don't say "Surrender Dorothy!" then my ex wife is out of town.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker
Depends on what you mean by "on the up and up." Certainly it was no more irregular than the annulments Kennedys and other well-connected RCs get today.

The Pope's decision not to give Henry an annulment was political as was Henry's decision to split from Rome.

I was Anglican for almost 30 years; my decision to leave was not based on political events of 500 years ago.

10 posted on 11/04/2006 6:28:13 PM PST by Martin Tell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Martin Tell

I would agree, if Henry had not applied for a dispensation to marry Catherine, which was granted.

Because of the dispensation, the request for an annulment was rather more than a usual annulment.

Catherine had been engaged to Henry's brother, which was why a dispensation was needed.

Full Disclosure: I got a dispensation to marry my first wife who was also my first cousin. That may be part of the reason why I am now of no religion.


11 posted on 11/04/2006 7:00:49 PM PST by donmeaker (If the sky don't say "Surrender Dorothy!" then my ex wife is out of town.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson