Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: DouglasKC

"The Roman Catholics claims Peter was the first pope of their church....Is either of these viewpoints correct; or is it just possible BOTH claims are wrong?"

Now I didn't read the whole article, but Peter was the first pope. Regardless of where he was, he was the first pope. It's not a viewpoint, it's a fact.


6 posted on 10/27/2006 6:38:10 PM PDT by mockingbyrd (Good heavens! What women these Christians have-----Libanus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mockingbyrd
Now I didn't read the whole article, but Peter was the first pope. Regardless of where he was, he was the first pope. It's not a viewpoint, it's a fact

That's not exactly the conclusion of the article. But I understand your belief.

7 posted on 10/27/2006 6:41:19 PM PDT by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: mockingbyrd

"Peter was the first pope. Regardless of where he was, he was the first pope. It's not a viewpoint, it's a fact."
________________________________

Based on what? A mistranslation of one passage in Matthew?


29 posted on 10/28/2006 9:10:01 AM PDT by wmfights (Psalm : 27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson