To: InterestedQuestioner
Hello Uncle Chip Looks like you've missed a few posts to yourself. Here's the thirty second version. Adairton8 told you he was not interested in continuing the discussion with you until you demonstrate a willingness to engage in a sincere and honest discussion. Given that you ignored what he wrote, some might go so far as to say he made a very wise choice. Adiaireton8, Is that you????? Adiaireton8, come on now, is that you???????
1,745 posted on
10/27/2006 3:46:16 PM PDT by
Uncle Chip
(Wise as a serpent, but harmless as a cardinal in . . . . October)
To: Uncle Chip
Uncle Chip,
I'll take this as your concession that you have no evidence to support your assertion that Peter was never in Rome. That is to say, you have neither Scripture nor historical evidence to support your claim.
You're argument runs contrary to all historical evidence, and it's based upon a logical fallacy.
The historical record is unanimous. The Apostle Peter was in fact in Rome, and he died there.
1,746 posted on
10/27/2006 3:59:27 PM PDT by
InterestedQuestioner
(Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you and your household will be saved.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson