Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: InterestedQuestioner
Hello Uncle Chip Looks like you've missed a few posts to yourself. Here's the thirty second version. Adairton8 told you he was not interested in continuing the discussion with you until you demonstrate a willingness to engage in a sincere and honest discussion. Given that you ignored what he wrote, some might go so far as to say he made a very wise choice.

Adiaireton8, Is that you????? Adiaireton8, come on now, is that you???????

1,745 posted on 10/27/2006 3:46:16 PM PDT by Uncle Chip (Wise as a serpent, but harmless as a cardinal in . . . . October)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1744 | View Replies ]


To: Uncle Chip
Uncle Chip,

I'll take this as your concession that you have no evidence to support your assertion that Peter was never in Rome. That is to say, you have neither Scripture nor historical evidence to support your claim.

You're argument runs contrary to all historical evidence, and it's based upon a logical fallacy.

The historical record is unanimous. The Apostle Peter was in fact in Rome, and he died there.
1,746 posted on 10/27/2006 3:59:27 PM PDT by InterestedQuestioner (Believe in the Lord Jesus, and you and your household will be saved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1745 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson