"So you believe that women should have a personal choice... to legally procure murder?"
I believe there are legitimate medical necessary reasons for abortion.
You made no such concessions in post #124 where you just said you were pro-abortion.
Dear marajade,
So you believe there are legitimate medical reasons for murdering an innocent human being. Okay, let's lay that one aside for a moment.
Should the law then permit abortion in only those cases where a woman has a legitimate medical reason?
What about when a woman believes she can't afford another baby. What about when a woman believes that having a baby would interfere with a goal like finishing college, or going to the prom. What if a woman believes she just doesn't want to be a mother?
Should women have a legal right to procure murder under these circumstances?
Remember, Roe v. Wade, along with its companion case, Doe v. Bolton, and the machinery of death jurisprudence that has grown up around these cases, permits an absolutely unlimited abortion license for any reason whatsoever at any time up until the baby is completely and entirely removed from within her mother. Even if the baby's legs, torso, arms, and neck are already born, if the baby's head is still within her mother, the baby may be legally killed. For any reason. Those are the demands of Roe v. Wade and the Court's interpretation thereof.
If I tell you I have financial hardship - I can't make the payments on my Porsche - can I have a right to rob banks?
sitetest