Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arkansas Episcopal Bishop Gives Nod For Gay Blessings
The Christian Challenge ^ | 7/19/2006 | Auburn Faber Traycik

Posted on 07/19/2006 5:44:27 PM PDT by sionnsar

A month after the Episcopal General Convention failed to answer the Windsor Report's call for a moratorium on public same-sex blessing rites, Arkansas Episcopal Bishop Larry Maze has announced that certain congregations will "likely move forward" on gay blessings in the weeks ahead.

Maze announced his policy supporting the exploration of same-sex blessings, on a congregation-by-congregation basis, in a letter to clergy today (July 19). It appears that the first gay blessing in the diocese could take place at St. Paul's, Fayetteville. In a letter to colleagues dated July 18, the Rev. Lowell Grisham of St. Paul's announced the availability of this "pastoral office" at his parish, with the bishop's permission and "with appropriate preparation." Bishop Maze says St. Michael's, Little Rock, is also nearing the possibility of blessing gay relationships.

In his letter, Bishop Maze acknowledged continuing disagreement in the church on the gay issue. But as he sees it, the Episcopal Church (TEC) remains "in the forefront of the effort to assure that gay and lesbian persons are made welcome in our churches" and under the governance of two relevant resolutions; one, adopted by the 1976 General Convention, states that "homosexual persons are children of God who have a full and equal claim with all other persons upon the love, acceptance, and pastoral concern and care of the Church." The second, adopted by General Convention 2003, states that local faith communities "are operating within the bounds of our common life as they explore and experience liturgies celebrating and blessing same-sex unions." It is on this basis that TEC leaders have claimed that the denomination has not authorized same-sex blessing rites, meaning in a churchwide sense, though clearly the convention has authorized such rites as are composed locally for the same purpose.

Maze's rather confused explanation about exactly what he is authorizing reflects this double-mindedness. "Neither the General Convention nor the Diocese of Arkansas has produced or approved official rites for the blessing of same-sex unions....No congregation, vestry, or priest is expected to interpret the pastoral concern and care of the Church for gay and lesbian persons in a way that includes the possibility of formal rites of blessing," the bishop stated. "However, those that do, have permission to proceed to work as a congregation to come to clarity around the issues involved when the Church blesses anything or anyone. If a couple seeks blessing in that congregation, they will join in that exploration much to the benefit of the congregation and the couple. This is a pastoral response and it is expected that each case will reflect the uniqueness of the congregation and the couple involved. It is expected that the bishop will be informed of each process, receive a report of work done, and see any liturgy that is produced before proceeding with a blessing rite."

A source in the Arkansas diocese said that, as he understands it, the position of the diocese's deputies to General Convention is that the convention's 11th-hour resolution, calling for diocesan bishops and standing committees not to consent to the consecration of actively homosexual bishops, will be an acceptable enough answer for the Anglican Communion, even though it does not address gay blessings.

The same source says he thought it was "unusual for the bishop to make this decision now, because an election for a new bishop is slated for November this year, and the new bishop will be consecrated on January 6, 2007."

In his letter, Fr. Grisham said that there are currently "no blessing services planned or in preparation" at St. Paul's, "but I anticipate that there will be couples who would like to avail themselves of this ministry in the near future. We'd love for that to happen with absolutely no publicity..."


TOPICS: Mainline Protestant; Other non-Christian
KEYWORDS: arkansas; ecusa; homosexualagenda

1 posted on 07/19/2006 5:44:29 PM PDT by sionnsar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ahadams2; secret garden; MountainMenace; SICSEMPERTYRANNUS; kaibabbob; angeliquemb9; ...
Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder Arlin Adams.

FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this moderately high-volume ping list (typically 3-9 pings/day).
This list is pinged by sionnsar, Huber and newheart.

Resource for Traditional Anglicans: http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com
More Anglican articles here.

Humor: The Anglican Blue (by Huber)

Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15

2 posted on 07/19/2006 5:45:18 PM PDT by sionnsar (†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† | Iran Azadi | SONY: 5yst3m 0wn3d, N0t Y0urs | NYT:Jihadi Journal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

Why stop at celebrating homosexuality in the church? There are other forbidden practices that need the same sort of support like beastilality and pedophilia; let's not forget necrophilia and I'm sure there are others as well.


3 posted on 07/19/2006 6:03:06 PM PDT by Hodar (With Rights, come Responsibilities. Don't assume one, without assuming the other.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar
We'd love for that to happen with absolutely no publicity..."

I'll just bet.

4 posted on 07/19/2006 6:21:04 PM PDT by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
In the interest of having the HOB look like a Whitman's sampler of perversions the next Bishop nominee should be a homosexual bestial necromaniac (one who likes F'n dead male sheep).

/dripping with sacrasm after several rum-n-cokes.
5 posted on 07/19/2006 6:52:42 PM PDT by lightman (The Office of the Keys should be exercised as some ministry needs to be exorcised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lightman
/dripping with sacrasm after several rum-n-cokes. Need to lighten up on that sacrasm, methinks *\;^?
6 posted on 07/19/2006 7:05:19 PM PDT by sionnsar (†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† | Iran Azadi | SONY: 5yst3m 0wn3d, N0t Y0urs | NYT:Jihadi Journal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar
Need to lighten up on that sacrasm, methinks *\;^?

I'm drinking to that!

7 posted on 07/19/2006 7:50:13 PM PDT by lightman (The Office of the Keys should be exercised as some ministry needs to be exorcised.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

I'm so sorry to see this church fall apart like this. I once was an Episcopalian and relatives who still are think it's no big deal.


8 posted on 07/19/2006 8:10:33 PM PDT by wmfights (Lead, Follow, or Get Out Of The WAY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar
.....Larry Maze......

That can't be his REAL name, can it? Somehow, it reminds me of the feminazi "theologian" Amy Hollywood!

Oh well, Arkansas is where clinton came from, isn't it? What can you expect?

9 posted on 07/19/2006 8:11:44 PM PDT by Honorary Serb (Kosovo is Serbia! Free Srpska! Abolish ICTY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
Why stop at celebrating homosexuality in the church? There are other forbidden practices that need the same sort of support like beastilality and pedophilia; let's not forget necrophilia and I'm sure there are others as well.

That's true. Jesus never mentioned them, did he?

10 posted on 07/19/2006 9:48:32 PM PDT by gogeo (The /sarc tag is a form of training wheels for those unable to discern intellectual subtlety.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hodar

I'm guessing polygamy is next. Much more support for it.


11 posted on 07/20/2006 10:13:50 AM PDT by polymuser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: polymuser

Yes, there is some ancient precedent for polygamy in the Judeo-Christian tradition, although it died out within Judaism long before the time of Christ.

By contrast, there is zero support for buggery. I find it amusing that the same liberals who want gay marriage claim to find polygamy abhorrent.

Most of our population (and probably nearly all of the liberal population) lives in serial polygamy already. Their support of the one and their rejection of the other has absolutely no basis in logic...


12 posted on 07/20/2006 10:54:08 AM PDT by Agrarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Agrarian
...absolutely no basis in logic.

How much liberalthink has a basis in logic? It's primarily emotion-based want-think, the stuff of pubescent, angry, want-to-be-grown-up teens.

13 posted on 07/21/2006 1:49:13 PM PDT by polymuser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson