Posted on 06/19/2006 11:45:57 AM PDT by monkapotamus
Our Vestry voted after the last convention to give parishioners the option to restrict pledges to our church and specify if we don't want any of our pledge to go to the diocese or national church. Since that time 100% of our pledge goes to our individual parish.
You do what you think is right. Out of curiosity, however, I'd be interested to know who your bishop is & on what side of these issues he/she comes down. While some may think that they can cloister themselves at the parish level & remain untouched by the heresy & apostasy that exists at the diocesan & national level, IMHO they'd be wrong.
There were a lot of folks at my old ECUSA parish who said almost exactly what you're saying. They were going to just ignore the fact that same-sex blessings were taking place at the diocesan cathedral & that the new Dean of the Cathedral came complete with his homosexual consort. They chose to ignore the fact that our bishop was ordaining no one except women & homosexuals - no men. Everything was just fine at our parish & they were all quite content to ignore what was happening at other parishes or at the diocesan level until that fateful day that our priest was suddenly transferred - replaced by a newly ordained lesbian priestess with her "partner" & two adopted children. That's when we left, along with half the parish.
I wish you well. Truly I do. But, I have to say that I'd be very interested to talk with you in six months time & find out how sticking your head in the sand worked out for you.
My Bishop is Bishop Stanton. I'm in a conservative diocese.
However, my own little church is fairly mixed.
Thanks for the good wishes. I don't think I could find a church that I agreed with on everything. People who try to do that keep moving around and end up in a Church of One.
I've been mad at the National Church for ten years. Ignoring them works for me.
England organized as a state centuries before her neighbors on the continent. Alfred the Great's kingdom in the 900's had roughly the same borders as Elizabeth II's today. Alfred's Capetian counterpart in Paris was titular king and only ruled the Ile-de-France. Basically, England had been up and running long before she was grafted into the Roman Church in 1066. Until that year, England considered herself in communion with but not under the authority of the Bishop of Rome. The Orthodox recognize the year of the Norman Conquest and Roman takeover, and not 1054, as the year they broke with Anglicanism.
When dealing with England, the Pope was not dealing with a loose patchwork of duchies and principalities (as was the case with France, Italy, and the Holy Roman Empire). Rather, he was dealing with a well organized and sophisticated nation state that was forging its own national identity much more quickly than continental states. From the Norman Conquest to the Spanish Armada, England and Rome never had good relations.
The 1549 Prayer Book is a translation ofthe Sarum Rite developed over the years in Salisbury, England.
That story seems odd to me. I've always understood that a parish (unless it is a mission) chooses its own priest (subject to the approval of the Bishop).
I doubt seriously that your priest was 'transferred.' Methodist priests can be transferred, not Episcopal priests. That's why it's so darn hard to get rid of a bad one.
I'm not sayin' it didn't happen... I'm just sayin'
The ECUSA is populated by the same barking moonbats that are minions to AlGore.
Sorry...improper use of the term "parish" caused the confusion, I think. Ours was, in fact, a "mission" church - small - about 75 avg. attendence on Sundays. As a mission, you pretty much take what you can get from the Diocese. However, even with a parish church, who you get is pretty well manipulated by the Diocesan. The parish is sent a list of clergy to interview. If you don't like any of them, they'll send you a few more until, hopefully, you find one that the Diocese wants to send & you want to accept. But make no mistake about it - the parish is NEVER sent a full list of available clergy from which to choose - only the ones the Diocese wishes to send. Which, brings up the other problem...Bp. Warner was/is notoriously liberal & a long-term supporter of the feminist & homosexual agendas. After a few years of ordaining nothing but women, homosexuals, & a few men who've failed at 1st careers in the secular world, the pool of available clergy for both mission & parishes is pretty poor. Recently, I saw the current list of 7 candidates for ordination in the Olympia Diocese...every one of them women & I have no doubt that at least a few are homosexuals, because that's +Vincent's style. Eventually, these churches really have no choices at all for clergy. You can take lesbian/gay #1, shrill feminist #2, or "I-couldn't-make-it-in-the-buisness-world-so-I-decided-to-become-a-priest" #3. Still think you have a choice?
read the article b*** head! The bishop with the foreign name is a conservative Christian.
Just a few FReepers can give this site a bad name.
I too am bothered by that, but the crown of England is really nothing but the "official" head, and hasn't exercised any authority over the Anglican Church in at least a couple hundred years. Even the Archbishop of Canterbury, the acting "head" has very limited authority...its more like a college of archbishops, not a strict hiearchy as with Rome.
Most Anglicans (and most all Protestants) would consider the Pope also as a kind of temporal authority.... who's office it would appear makes him speak for God. I do realize there are all kinds of limits on the Pope's authority, however, it appears the entire curia is temporal, and very authoritative...having more authority than scripture itself.
Not looking for an argument here, just giving you what traditional Protestants think about Rome.
With the Anglicans, depending on how the rest of the communion reacts to the apostate Episcopal bishops, we may well see how a church is supposed to deal with serious heresy...which is exactly what this festering sore of liberal churchmen (and women...and, um, neuter?) has become.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.