["would tarnish our proud tradition of expanding citizens' rights by Constitutional amendment" Hm. I was going to make a comment about the RKBA, but that was Constitutional revisionism, not amendment. Still, there is Prohibition, but I'm nit-picking. --sionnsar]
posted on 05/26/2006 5:30:52 PM PDT
To: ahadams2; meandog; gogeo; Lord Washbourne; Calabash; axegrinder; AnalogReigns; Uriah_lost; ...
Traditional Anglican ping
, continued in memory of its founder Arlin Adams
if you want on or off this moderately high-volume ping list (typically 3-9 pings/day).
This list is pinged by sionnsar
Resource for Traditional Anglicans: http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com
More Anglican articles here
Humor: The Anglican Blue
Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15
posted on 05/26/2006 5:42:07 PM PDT
(†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† | Iran Azadi | SONY: 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0urs)
Gee, where are all the liberals demanding the clergy stay out of government? Come on ACLU, separation of church and state, freedom from religion, etc.
I suppose that if some bishops had appeared on Capitol Hill to support the amendment, we'd be hearing screaming about "separation of church and state".
posted on 05/28/2006 8:33:53 AM PDT
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson