Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: DelphiUser; colorcountry; Colofornian
I'm confused. Are you disputing that your leaders said such things, or are you disputing the substance of what they said.

Your debating method here is quite ineffective. When challenged with a quote you neither admit the substance nor deny the substance, but instead you simply challenge the validity of the source. IOW you change the subject.

So here's my challenge:

If in fact those quotes are exactly what these leaders of your church are quoted as saying, then do you believe that what they said was a correct enunciation of LDS doctrine or not?

Regardless of whether or not these guys were correctly quoted, do you agree or disagree with what they are quoted as saying?

367 posted on 05/05/2006 11:16:04 AM PDT by P-Marlowe (((172 * 3.141592653589793238462) / 180) * 10 = 30.0196631)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies ]


To: P-Marlowe; colorcountry; Colofornian

>>Your debating method here is quite ineffective.

I am not debating yet, as there is nothing to debate, I get so many un-sourced quotes that I look up and half the time they don’t exist or are misquoted that I won’t even bother to debate an un sourced quote that I am asked to confirm or deny, it’s a matter of time, not knowledge.

Source or don’t post. Presumably you got the quote from somewhere, post the link. LDS.org is a great resource for this.

>>Regardless of whether or not these guys were correctly quoted, do you agree or
>>disagree with what they are quoted as saying?

Context before conjecture I do not yet know what they were saying if this was taken out of context.


382 posted on 05/05/2006 1:02:15 PM PDT by DelphiUser ("You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson