Posted on 03/23/2006 12:29:49 PM PST by NYer
[+] Benedict XVI Heresies and Errors
Saving the Baby
Most Rev. Donald J. Sanborn
In a speech to the Curia, Benedict XVI uses desperate measures to try to save his baby — Vatican II — from the accusation of discontinuity with the past. Past church decisions, he says, are 'contingent because they are related to a reality itself changeable' — pure Modernism. The martyrs 'died for religious liberty' — pure blasphemy. (MHT Newsletter, Jan 2006)
[17 Jan 2006]
Damning Limbo to Hell
Most Rev. Donald J. Sanborn
Benedict XVI prepares to 'suppress' Limbo — and promulgate a new feel-good heresy. (MHT Newsletter, Jan 2006)
[17 Jan 2006]
The New Ecclesiology: An Overview
Most Rev. Donald J. Sanborn
Vatican II's teaching about the nature of the Church, who belongs to it, salvation outside it, and why the teaching is explicitly heretical. (Catholic Restoration, Sep-Oct 2004)
[23 Oct 2005]
The New Ecclesiology: Documentation
Most Rev. Donald J. Sanborn
Side-by-side comparison of Vatican II and pre-Vatican II teaching on (1) Whether heretical and schismatic churches are part of Christ's Church. (2) Whether it is possible to be part of the Christ's Church without submission to the Pope. (3) Whether the 'one, holy, Catholic and apostolic Church' becomes 'present' in every valid celebration of the Eucharist. (4) Whether the Holy Ghost uses schismatic and/or heretical sects as means of salvation. (PDF, Catholic Restoration, Sep-Oct 2004)
[23 Oct 2005]
Don't Get Your Hopes Up about Ratzinger: Q & A
Most Rev. Donald J. Sanborn
Will Benedict XVI throw traditionalists a bone like the traditional Mass to lure them into 'reconciled diversity' with Protestants and schismatics? Benedict XVI's ecumenical/modernist heresies concerning the Church, the faith and religious evolution. (MHT Newsletter, May 2005)
[27 Apr 2005]
Benedict XVI's Ecumenical One-World Church
Rev. Anthony Cekada
What are we to make of Ratzinger? Preliminary considerations about his record, his teachings and the consequences. (Sermon, Cincinnati, 24 April 2005)
[27 Apr 2005]
Ratzinger: 99% Protestant
Rev. Francesco Ricossa
Ratzinger and the modernist protestant Cullmann cook up an ecumenical church of the future. (Sodalitium 1993)
[19 Apr 2005]
O Sacrament Unholy
Most Rev. Donald J. Sanborn
Ratzinger and John Paul II approve a rite of Mass with no consecration. The fruits of false ecumenism. (MHT Letter, February 2002)
[9 Oct 2002]
Ratzinger's Dominus Jesus: A Critical Analysis
Most Rev. Donald J. Sanborn
Ratzinger's and John Paul II's supposedly traditional declaration is loaded with heresies about the nature of the Church. (MHT Newsletter, October 2000)
[1 Dec 2000]
Communion: Ratzingers's Ecumenical One-World Church
Most Rev. Donald J. Sanborn
Vatican II, John Paul II, and Benedict XVI teach a heretical notion of the Church. A milestone study, (Sacerdotium 5, Autumn 1992)
[25 Nov 2000]
Critical Analysis of the Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification
Most Rev. Donald J. Sanborn
The heresies in the 31 October 1999 Declaration signed in Augsburg by the Lutherans and John Paul II's representative. (MHT Letter, January 2000)
[25 Nov 2000]
Pope Cardinals discuss lifting SSPX excommunication and free use of Latin missal
This guy is not associated with the SSPX.
In fact, he couldn't even stay in the SSPV.
He is a sedevacantist "independent."
read tonite
God save us from believers who are more Catholic than the Pope.
It's even harder to believe that men who are themselves excommunicated would presume to accuse the Holy Father of heresy. I am well aware that a great many Catholics (myself included) agree with much of what SSPX advocates; however, the methods they have used are really not all that different than those used by heretics throughout history.
Thanks ... the web site said 'traditionalmass' which I thought fell into one group. Didn't realize it had splintered so much in 40 years.
Wait a second... it is the wrong end up! It is the Pope who is supposed to brand others heretics, not the other way around. Besides, isn't he ex officio infallible?
Anyone can tell who commits heresy, simply comparing what they teach with the Magisterial teachings. We are not Church authorities, so we can not sentence anyone, but that should never stop us from exposing heresy for what it is.
At least some do not water down heresy by calling it mere error.
Also, the Catholic Church has never split into groups or factions; people decide to leave the Church by associating with other groups or by adopting beliefs already anathematized.
Pox on all their houses.
By the way, it's not so much about bringing the Mass back to the dioceses as much as it is holding the Catholic faith. Your original post highlights matters of faith which were the reason why Bishop Sanborn and like-minded people do not want to be in communion with Benedict XVI.
There are some who have questioned the validity of Benedict XVI's episcopal consecration (meaning he would not be a valid pope on those grounds). Just thought you might want to be aware of this.
I don't get it.
Yep, you nailed it.
AMEN!!!!
SSPX, SSPV, Sedevacantist "independent." Is there any real difference among these groups?
Meaningful to them, less so to us.
The lesson here for all of us is not to be to quick to jump to conclusions or cast aspersions about different people or groups. Even with people that may be wrong, there is nothing to be gained from the attacks we have here on Free Republic. No one can claim that they are following the lead of the Holy Father by such attacks or by claiming to weigh in on the status of certain groups or people. He hasn't take such an approach, so why should we?
Yes. The SSPX, while in, at minimum, an irregular relationship with Rome, claim to recognize the Pope as valid. They also are quite possibly on the verge of being regularized.
The others do not and are not.
It is true, though, that there are those within the SSPX (which is a society of priests), and some laymen who assist at SSPX chapels who are functional sedevacantists. What proportion are like this, I cannot say.
Are you intentionally trying to implicate the SSPX in the writings of this nut, Rev. Sanborn, or are you just confusing/obfuscating the issues? He has nothing to do with the SSPX...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.