I don't think he did.
I was making a joke at Forest's expense. He reads John 3:5 as a reference to birth of the womb and spiritual rebirth, rather than as a reference to baptism as we sacramentally understand it. In order to make the text fit his theology, he insists that when Jesus speaks of "water" in John 3:5, the actual reference is to the vaginal fluids. I find this quite hilarious.