Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: HarleyD
I'm told "St. Paul's writing did not exist yet." and Timothy was only reading from the Old Testament even though Timothy was reading from 1 Timothy. DUH!!!

Harley, please, get a grammar book. A Protestant grammar book will do. This is my sentence, which you quote:

We do not see that Timothy knows the New Testament Canon, which as of St. Paul's writing did not exist yet.
It parses thus:
We do not see X

X ::= Timothy knows the New Testament Canon, which Y

Y ::= as of Z did not exist yet

Z ::= St. Paul's writing

1 Timothy did exist. The canon as of the writing of 1 Timothy did not.

The scripture Timothy knew since his youth did not contain the letter St. Paul wrote to him.

The letter to Timothy is not the entire New Testament canon.

2,135 posted on 01/30/2006 10:24:29 AM PST by annalex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2134 | View Replies ]


To: annalex

But was Timothy reading from the New Testament? It was your claim earlier that he was not.


2,136 posted on 01/30/2006 10:28:56 AM PST by HarleyD (Man's steps are ordained by the LORD, How then can man understand his way? - Pro 20:24)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2135 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson