I called for a defense of Christians in the orginal post.
Big difference in semantics between defending and killing.
Now, take your strawman elsewhere.
Defending Christians is a good thing, but in your original post you said: "I'm only speaking of professing Christians that should have joined together and assembled a force to fight the evil Muslim hordes."
Which, in the case of Rwanda, meant fighting the protectors of tens of thousands of Chrisitans and blaming them for the genocide. There's a difference between defending and fighting, but fighting the people who are defending the innocent from genocide is a lot closer to killing than defending.
I'm glad you've recognized that, while it's the standard answer for the "Nuke Mecca" crowd, blaming innocent Muslims for all the problems of the world is useless, stupid and, when the blinders are on too tight, deadly.