National Right-To-Life has been trying to ban any category of abortion for three decades and it hasn't worked. Your proposal has been tried and has not resulted in your predicted outcome. Ergo, your assertion of questionable motivation is simply wrong.
I agree with you religiously and ethically, but this country will NEVER abolish ALL abortion.
Based on what you've said in this thread, I doubt you agree with me in either way or that your bleak prediction troubles you in the least.
We could get none except for rape, incest and the life or death issues with mom.
Again, we have tried that approach and it hasn't worked. Your weak attempt at blaming the good guys betrays your false position on this issue.
Right-To-Life from what I've seen have represented the proper belief that there should be NO ABORTION and I find nothing wrong with that in their ethical view.
There needs to be a single focus among the conservative and religious folks to stop the NO ABORTION on the political end until we first accomplish limiting abortions to the rape, incest and health victims.
You really can't bring up NO ABORTIONS to the common American person because they don't believe women should be forced to have babies today.
Granted we can go into a paragraph just about the attitude and facts surrounding the last statement, but the bottom line is we need to unite on the 98% first and then scrap and fight for the remaining ones on the side one at a time.
The overall American People at large are turned right off by the view of NO ABORTIONS EVER. So we can be correct and proud to say that correct Godly view, but we may continue to lose 750,000 a year we could save if we quit the all or nothing scenarios IMO.