Go back and re-read my post Harley. I wasn't denying or agreeing with anything about the methods or the affiliations.
All I was saying is that you can't "prove" something just because "it's on the Internet."
Well, at your suggestion I did go back and reread the posts. While you certainly did state that one cannot "prove" anything just because it's on the Internet (something I would agree with) the implications in the "Aw shucks..." gave me the legitimate impression of disagreement.
I see from this post you're neither disagreeing or agreeing with my statement; only my poorly chosen phrasing.