To: ahadams2; Peanut Gallery; tellw; nanetteclaret; Saint Reagan; Marauder; stan_sipple; SuzyQue; ...
Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder
Arlin Adams.
FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this moderately high-volume ping list (typically 3-7 pings/day).
This list is pinged by
sionnsar and
newheart.
Resource for Traditional Anglicans:
http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com
Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15
2 posted on
04/21/2005 4:22:25 PM PDT by
sionnsar
(†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† || Iran Azadi || Where are we going, and why are we in this handbasket?)
To: sionnsar
This is a very interesting article in that it demonstrates in a way I hadn't seen before, the Episcopalian, and for all I know, the Anglican notion of "communion". The priests say they have been threatened with disposition for abandoning communion "with the church". In Orthodoxy, communion wouldn't be a description of the relation between a priest and "the church", but rather of that between bishops and other bishops. To the extent that clergy and faithful are unified around their bishop in a diocese, those clergy and faithful are "in communion" with the clergy and faithful in other dioceses where the bishops are in communion with the bishop of the first diocese. Were a similar situation to develop in an Orthodox diocese, unless there were a way for the priest and the bishop to work out a transfer, which likely couldn't happen if the issue was heresy, then a disobedient priest would simply be defrocked I suspect. His only recourse, I suppose, would, in the case of the GOA, be to the Patriarchal Synod.
I appreciate this post because it further fleshes out for me what these men mean when they speak of communion.
3 posted on
04/21/2005 6:08:22 PM PDT by
Kolokotronis
("Set a guard over my mouth, O Lord; keep watch over the door of my lips!" (Psalm 141:3))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson