1 posted on
04/16/2005 5:43:24 PM PDT by
sionnsar
To: ahadams2; Peanut Gallery; tellw; nanetteclaret; Saint Reagan; Marauder; stan_sipple; SuzyQue; ...
Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder
Arlin Adams.
FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this moderately high-volume ping list (typically 3-7 pings/day).
This list is pinged by
sionnsar and
newheart.
Resource for Traditional Anglicans:
http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com
Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15
2 posted on
04/16/2005 5:44:16 PM PDT by
sionnsar
(†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† || Iran Azadi || Where are we going, and why are we in this handbasket?)
To: sionnsar
I have hopes for a rational resolution to this issue, but I sense that Smith will not approach this meeting with an open mind. I believe he is determined to install a gay bishop in Connecticut, and will not be dissuaded.
That said, I cannot for the life of me understand the genesis of this determination to drop the church into a state of apostasy and defy the Word of God.
3 posted on
04/16/2005 7:04:54 PM PDT by
Marauder
(Sex is the most fun you can have without smiling.)
To: sionnsar
The Bishop understandably is concerned that meeting with these parishes as a group and making a common covenant with them would set a dangerous precedent that would invite other interest blocks, all the parishes wanting immediate same sex marriage for instance, to follow suit. Oh good grief, the Bishop wouldn't mind 'interest blocks' demanding same sex marriages. He just doesn't like the opposition to that, or to the ordination of divorced fornicating homosexual bishops, that's all.
It's this mealy-mouthed pap designed to obfuscate the pluriformed Episcopalian proletariat that will eventually inundate all the rectors stalked by the grisly demons haunting the Dromintene halls.
(Maybe I should lay off trying to read Griswold's gibberish.)
4 posted on
04/16/2005 7:06:33 PM PDT by
xJones
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson