Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bristol church may leave over gay bishop
VirtueOnline-News ^ | 4/13/2005 | Mark Zaretsky

Posted on 04/14/2005 7:46:53 AM PDT by sionnsar

BRISTOL, CT (4/13/2005)--Acceptance of a gay bishop by Connecticut Episcopal Bishop Andrew D. Smith is threatening to rive a Bristol congregation from the church. Its priest, threatened with removal, contemplates leaving.

Six retired Episcopal bishops issued a scathing rebuke to Smith Tuesday, accusing him of "brutal and unconscionable ecclesiastical tyranny" for threatening to remove six priests who disagree with his support for the church's first openly gay bishop.

Among the six priests who could be removed as soon as Friday are two from city parishes -- the Rev. Mark Hansen of St. John's Church and the Rev. Donald Helmandollar of Trinity Episcopal Church, whose membership appears dug in squarely behind him.

The conflict has simmered since 2003, when Smith was among the bishops who voted to confirm the Rev. V. Gene Robinson of New Hampshire to be the church's first openly gay bishop. Though homosexuality is accepted by many Episcopalians, the church has not officially permitted the ordination of non-celibate gays and lesbians or the blessing of gay unions.

All six priests now under threat openly disagreed with Smith on the issue and asked him to name another bishop to minister to them.

Helmandollar said the six Connecticut clergymen have asked Smith to "clarify his charges." But, he added, "this has only made us stronger. We're going to continue doing business as usual."

Smith has refused to give up his authority and has charged that they "abandoned the communion of the church."

The retired bishops, all members of the conservative American Anglican Council, made it clear Tuesday they think it's the other way around.

"Bishop Andrew Smith has repudiated the faith he swore to at his consecration" when he voted for Robinson, they wrote. "Bereft of the faith which alone establishes true unity in the church, he now attempts to impose unity by uncanonical coercion against six faithful clergy in his diocese.

"Since Bishop Edward Fowler put John Bunyan in jail for 11 years in the 17th century, there has scarcely been such an example of brutal and unconscionable ecclesiastical tyranny," the bishops said.

Smith, in a statement released by the diocese, responded, "I disagree with their characterizations. ..I believe that the people of the Episcopal Church USA, including the Episcopalians in Connecticut, are faithful Christians who love God and witness to the community. My continued hope in our current situation is for reconciliation and a return to mutual ministry."

Michael Saman, a warden at Trinity Episcopal, said Helmandollar has continued to do his job here preaching the Bible.

"Things are changing in today's world, yes," Saman said. "But some things should never change."

Saman said if Helmandollar is deposed, members of the church will pick up and move to another location in Bristol. "We have plans in action right now to move to another location," he said. "We also have met with an attorney to discuss the issue."

The congregation took a vote at church, he said. "Ninety-two percent of our parish was against [Helmandollar's removal]," Saman said.

Helmandollar, with the support of parish members, wrote Smith a letter when the controversy began to swirl. It read, in part, "Trinity Church is in a pronounced period of mourning and grief for our church and the direction in which you are leading it. I [Helmandollar] fail to see how I, or Trinity, have ever departed from your oversight as the Bishop of Connecticut, in spite of the theological differences that exist between us and have been discussed."

If removed, Helmandollar said he plans on moving out of Connecticut so he may continue to practice his priesthood.

"We're not going to surrender," Helmandollar said. "We don't want to move."

Katherine Marcotte of The Bristol Press and an Associated Press report contributed to this story.


TOPICS: Mainline Protestant
KEYWORDS: angpost4; connecticut; ct6; ecusa; fallout; homosexualagenda; schism

1 posted on 04/14/2005 7:46:54 AM PDT by sionnsar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ahadams2; Peanut Gallery; tellw; nanetteclaret; Saint Reagan; Marauder; stan_sipple; SuzyQue; ...
Traditional Anglican ping, continued in memory of its founder Arlin Adams.

FReepmail sionnsar if you want on or off this moderately high-volume ping list (typically 3-7 pings/day).
This list is pinged by sionnsar and newheart.

Resource for Traditional Anglicans: http://trad-anglican.faithweb.com

Speak the truth in love. Eph 4:15

2 posted on 04/14/2005 7:47:16 AM PDT by sionnsar (†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† || Iran Azadi || Where are we going, and why are we in this handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar
If removed, Helmandollar said he plans on moving out of Connecticut so he may continue to practice his priesthood.

So he plans on abandoning his flock to save his career with the ECUSA? That in itself sounds like a bad career choice, and reflects poorly on him as well.

3 posted on 04/14/2005 8:15:44 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PAR35

....what a mess!


4 posted on 04/14/2005 8:53:13 AM PDT by SweetCaroline ((I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me...Philippians 4:13))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
So he plans on abandoning his flock to save his career with the ECUSA? That in itself sounds like a bad career choice, and reflects poorly on him as well.

"Moving out of Connecticut" is probably code for seeking pastoral oversight elsewhere. I didn't see anything else that supports a physical translation (except to a new locale in Bristol -- which means the parish is leaving both ECUSA and the property).

5 posted on 04/14/2005 9:35:48 AM PDT by sionnsar (†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† || Iran Azadi || Where are we going, and why are we in this handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar
I hope your interpretation is correct, but a plain reading of the sentence seems to clearly suggest that he is going to be physically relocating from the state, and there is nothing in there which suggests that he is planning to remain with the congregation. The congregation itself is said to have contingency plans to meet at a different location.
6 posted on 04/14/2005 9:40:42 AM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

What? Aren't there any straight Epsicopal bishops in New England?


7 posted on 04/14/2005 9:41:37 AM PDT by AmishDude (Join the AmishDude fan club: "You are a wise man." -- Torie; "You rock!" -- TonyRo76)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PAR35
Yes, it's hard to say. If he physically moves, it would appear that it would be so that he can remain in ECUSA, while his parish leaves.

There's always the issue of the pension fund...

8 posted on 04/14/2005 10:32:00 AM PDT by sionnsar (†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† || Iran Azadi || Where are we going, and why are we in this handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

Sure there are. The issue centers around Robinson.


9 posted on 04/14/2005 10:33:04 AM PDT by sionnsar (†trad-anglican.faithweb.com† || Iran Azadi || Where are we going, and why are we in this handbasket?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson