On December 9, 1531, Mary appeared on a hill just outside Mexico City in Mexico to Juan Diego. She asked that a shrine be built there.Juan told the bishop and the bishop asked for a sign that it was really Mary that asked for the shrine to be built.
Juan returned to Mary and told her of the bishop's request. Mary told Juan to gather roses from the hill and take them to the bishop as his sign.
It was December and not time for the roses to bloom but Juan found many beautiful roses. He began gathering them up and put them in his tilma (A covering over clothes).
He carried them back to the bishop. He explained what Mary had said to him and presented the bishop with the sign he had asked for. As he unfolded his tilma, the roses fell to the floor. As the roses fell, there on his tilma, was an image of Mary, the Mother of God.
The chapel was built in 1535.
Many people feel this is what Mary really looks like since she put this image on the tilma. Notice underneath, holding Mary, is St. Michael the archangel.
Neat!!!!!
Still involves rosaries, and Moslems worship those things. Not likely you'll get many regular Protestants to cross that bridge.
Bush v. Gore was decided on 12/12 the Feast of Our Lady of Guadalupe. Curious coincidence :-)
Bump, and beautiful picture, as usual.
She last made an appearance in WWII during an American bombing raid. According to the program I'm watching at the moment on COX Cable one of our pilots reported an aparition of what seemed to be a very tall woman catching bombs and tossing them aside.
This was also reported extensively on the ground.
According to this program Matsu is presently the most venerated goddess in Taiwan. You have to talk directly to Matsu since no one may intervene.
Thai Buddhists regularly report such apparitions as well.
I don't begin to understand these visions and images. However, they seem to be a worldwide phenomenon, and there is quite a bit of commonality in them.
GUADALUPE DEVOTION IS CROSSING INTO PROTESTANT DENOMINATIONS
Relic From Guadalupe Tilma to Tour U.S.
The Amazing Truth of Our Lady of Guadalupe
Celebrating 470 years of an ongoing miracle, the apparition of Our Lady of Guadalupe 1531
Science Stunned by Virgin of Guadalupe´s Eyes
OUR LADY OF GUADALUPE [Read only]
BUMP
These folks are obviously still clinging to their Catholic roots. They need to find a Roman Catholic parish to join. They are not theologically Protestant, why are they going to a Methodist church?
Veneration of statues? What kind of nut would venerate a chunk of plaster? Sloppy or deliberate wording by the author.
It is necessary to point out to you on this thread one of the unchangeable "Articles of Religion" of the United Methodist Church. (This is in the 1700's language of John Wesley.)
Article 14Of Purgatory The Romish doctrine concerning purgatory, pardon, worshiping, and adoration, as well of images as of relics, and also invocation of saints, is a fond thing, vainly invented, and grounded upon no warrant of Scripture, but repugnant to the Word of God.
That said, this does not say that one cannot have a serious discussion about art and the church as opposed to veneration/adoration etc. In other words, it's the PURPOSE of any "art" that makes it appropriate or inappropriate.
If for reflection, commemoration, etc., then there's no problem. As soon (I'm speaking about our church) as one crosses the line into veneration, adoration, worship, etc., then one has violated our 14th Article of Religion.
It is necessary to point out to you on this thread one of the unchangeable "Articles of Religion" of the United Methodist Church. (This is in the 1700's language of John Wesley.)
Article 14Of Purgatory The Romish doctrine concerning purgatory, pardon, worshiping, and adoration, as well of images as of relics, and also invocation of saints, is a fond thing, vainly invented, and grounded upon no warrant of Scripture, but repugnant to the Word of God.
That said, this does not say that one cannot have a serious discussion about art and the church as opposed to veneration/adoration etc. In other words, it's the PURPOSE of any "art" that makes it appropriate or inappropriate.
If for reflection, commemoration, etc., then there's no problem. As soon (I'm speaking about our church) as one crosses the line into veneration, adoration, worship, etc., then one has violated our 14th Article of Religion.
I will bet not one that comes from the Reformation . We still do not do icons ...
It would not be a surprise in the counter reformation churches.. they have always been on the way back to Rome.
Merry Christmas NYer hope our ice does not head your way !
Merry Christmas.