Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: pascendi
Alright, so he's with these people, you're with him.

Definition and corroborating (Catechism is agreeable) support please, and then I'll see about addressing such a 'predicament'.
64 posted on 09/11/2004 2:48:32 PM PDT by GirlShortstop (« O sublime humility! That the Lord... should humble Himself like this... »)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies ]


To: GirlShortstop
"Definition and corroborating (Catechism is agreeable) support please, and then I'll see about addressing such a 'predicament'."

The predicament is that the people he gave his blessing and approval to are liberal socialists of a new-age spirituality.

No proof is necessary for what is obvious. The obvious can be had from reading the two links provided. The first link shows his blessing and approval of these people. The second link shows that these people are actually liberal socialist syncretists of a new-age spirituality.

You just need to read the two links, that's all. They contain no spin from any traditional Catholic, no commentary, no misinterpretation. The text is the Pope's own, and the website is the work of those people whom he blesses. He calls their work his own.

The ball is your court.

Nobody has asked anyone to leave the Catholic Faith, but rather, to take the Faith on fully and to oppose what is contrary to the Catholic Faith, and to quit denying that some really creepy stuff is happening top to bottom in the Church right now.

The pope is my pontiff and I pray for him. But no explanation will suffice for what is an obvious predicament.
67 posted on 09/11/2004 3:40:40 PM PDT by pascendi (Quicumque vult salvus esse, ante omnia opus est, ut teneat catholicam fidem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson