Too bad I couldn't have visited it when I was there!
Posted on 05/28/2004 9:12:03 PM PDT by Salvation
Code: ZE04042524
Date: 2004-05-25
Decorating the Sanctuary
And More on Letting the Children Run
ROME, MAY 25, 2004 (Zenit.org).- Answered by Father Edward McNamara, professor of liturgy at the Regina Apostolorum Pontifical University.
Q: I have been searching for some type of directives regarding the decorating of the sanctuary. In the parish here we have a decorating committee that can do just about any type of decorating that it wants. Isn't there a book that contains what is permissible and what isn't? -- A.R., Hinckley, Ohio
A: By decoration I suppose you mean the occasional decoration of the sanctuary (flowers, etc.) and not the overall structure of the sanctuary itself.
The U.S. bishops' conference has recently published an official document, "Built of Living Stones," which gives concrete guidelines for many aspects of church construction and design.
The document may be obtained from the conference itself or from Catholic bookstores.
Apart from this, some general norms of the Church regarding decorating the sanctuary are contained in the General Instruction of the Roman Missal, in Nos. 304 and following, which address some aspects directly regarding the decoration of the altar but whose principles may be applied to the sanctuary in general.
No. 304 states: "Out of reverence for the celebration of the memorial of the Lord and for the banquet in which the Body and Blood of the Lord are offered on an altar where this memorial is celebrated, there should be at least one white cloth, its shape, size, and decoration in keeping with the altar's design. When, in the dioceses of the United States of America, other cloths are used in addition to the altar cloth, then those cloths may be of other colors possessing Christian honorific or festive significance according to longstanding local usage, provided that the uppermost cloth covering the mensa (i.e., the altar cloth itself) is always white in color."
No. 305 reminds us that: "Moderation should be observed in the decoration of the altar."
This applies especially to floral decorations, which "should always be done with moderation and placed around the altar rather than on its mensa," and which should be especially moderate during Advent and which are forbidden during Lent except for the Laetare Sunday (Fourth Sunday of Lent), as well as solemnities and feasts.
No. 306 gives as a principle that "Only what is required for the celebration of the Mass may be placed on the mensa of the altar: namely, from the beginning of the celebration until the proclamation of the Gospel, the Book of the Gospels; then from the Presentation of the Gifts until the purification of the vessels, the chalice with the paten, a ciborium if necessary, and, finally, the corporal, the purificator, the pall, and the Missal." A microphone is also permitted when necessary.
This means that any other elements or symbols should not be placed on the altar.
No. 308 requires the use of a "cross, with the figure of Christ crucified upon it, either on the altar or near it, where it is clearly visible to the assembled congregation. It is appropriate that such a cross, which calls to mind for the faithful the saving Passion of the Lord, remain near the altar even outside of liturgical celebrations."
No. 307 deals specifically with candles but also makes another valid criterion with respect to general decorum: "The candles ... are to be appropriately placed either on or around the altar in a way suited to the design of the altar and the sanctuary so that the whole may be well balanced and not interfere with the faithful's clear view of what takes place at the altar or what is placed on it."
Further on, No. 318 speaks of the use of sacred images: "In the earthly Liturgy, the Church participates, by a foretaste, in that heavenly Liturgy which is celebrated in the holy city of Jerusalem toward which she journeys as a pilgrim, and where Christ is sitting at the right hand of God; and by venerating the memory of the Saints, she hopes one day to have some part and fellowship with them.
"Thus, images of the Lord, the Blessed Virgin Mary, and the Saints, in accordance with the Church's most ancient tradition, should be displayed for veneration by the faithful in sacred buildings and should be arranged so as to usher the faithful toward the mysteries of faith celebrated there. For this reason, care should be taken that their number not be increased indiscriminately, and that they be arranged in proper order so as not to distract the faithful's attention from the celebration itself. There should usually be only one image of any given Saint. Generally speaking, in the ornamentation and arrangement of a church as far as images are concerned, provision should be made for the devotion of the entire community as well as for the beauty and dignity of the images."
From these numbers of the GIRM it may be inferred that what the Church desires with regard to the decoration of the sanctuary is an overall sense of moderation and well-balanced dignity, limiting, as far as possible, the use of merely decorative objects that have no direct liturgical function and avoidance of creating obstacles to the clear view of the assembly or impediments to its concentration on the celebration of the sacred mystery itself.
Thus, while the decoration of the sanctuary should remain fairly stable, there is ample space for traditional elements that reflect the liturgical season (Advent wreath, poinsettias at Christmastide, etc.) and for the occasional use of truly artistic banners on major feasts.
Although artistic banners may be used it is best to avoid the use of message posters in the sanctuary as well as other occasional articles such as children's drawings and the like which might draw attention away from the centrality of the celebration.
These objects are not necessarily excluded from the precincts of the church but should preferably be placed in some other suitable place outside the sanctuary.
* * *
Follow-up: Let the Children Run?
I received many comments from readers about toddlers running around church (see May 11). Some of the comments came from parents of large families who confirmed that it is possible to teach children to be quiet in Church, especially when given good example by mom and dad.
A few readers quoted Christ's words to me -- "Suffer the little children to come to me, for it is to such as these, the kingdom of heaven belongs" -- although it was not always clear if they quoted it for or against what I said.
If the text is taken to mean that children are welcome at Mass, I fully agree. If it is interpreted to mean that parents are somehow dispensed from teaching good manners to their children, then I cannot concur with such an exegesis.
There may of course be cases of parents who have children with special needs or conditions whose actions may cause occasional disruptions that cannot be attributed to bad behavior.
In such circumstances the parents require the support and the patience of the community, just as the children should not be deprived of God's grace in the midst of their difficulties.
At the same time, out of charity the parents should do all that is possible to take into account the needs of the other faithful, especially if they notice a particular agitation which might cause prolonged disruption.
In especially grave cases, parents could attempt to rotate Mass schedules so as not to attend the same celebration always. Or they might even speak to the pastor to see if a special arrangement can be made for the Christian formation and sacramental life of these children.
Some correspondents asked particular questions regarding Masses specifically for children.
A Kentucky reader wrote: "Our pastor has several children's Masses for the students (K-8) during the year. Sometimes he invites all the children to stand with him around the altar. Some of the children are very young and not attentive. He also asks the children to raise their hands just as he does over the bread and wine during the consecration. This action seems to obscure the difference between the ordained priesthood and the laity and therefore is not edifying to the children. Is the priest acting correctly or is either of these practices prohibited?"
The directory for children does allow for some adaptations of the rite for children's Masses, understood above all as weekday celebrations at which the vast majority are youngsters. But having the little ones stand around the altar is not one of them.
In some circumstances such as a church with a distant altar that hinders communication with children, it is probably preferable, as suggested by No. 25 of the Directory for Masses with Children, to celebrate the Mass in another worthy place.
Thus, while it is good that the children be close to the altar of celebration, some form of distinction should remain between the two spaces.
In a similar fashion, while the directory's Nos. 33-34 do allow for some adaptation of gestures (above all, encouraging processions), having the children raise their hands during the consecration is, like gathering around the altar, more likely to confuse them about the Church's Eucharistic faith.
As No. 21 of the directory states: "It is always necessary to keep in mind that these eucharistic celebrations must lead children toward the celebration of Mass with adults, especially in the Masses at which the Christian community must come together on Sundays. Thus, apart from adaptations that are necessary because of the children's age, the result should not be entirely special rites, markedly different from the Order of Mass celebrated with a congregation. The purpose of the various elements should always correspond with what is said in the General Instruction of the Roman Missal on individual points, even if at times for pastoral reasons an absolute identity cannot be insisted upon."
* * *
Readers may send questions to news@zenit.org. Please put the word "Liturgy" in the subject field. The text should include your initials, your city and your state, province or country.
Should prove to be a great discussion. How is your sactuary decorated?
Or I guess we could talk about the second part and children at Mass.
When our kids were in arms until they graduated from high school, they always went to Mass with us and were QUIET and well-behaved -- or else they got a good talking-to when we got home. (Sometimes taken out to the cry room too.)
**No. 304 states: "Out of reverence for the celebration of the memorial of the Lord and for the banquet in which the Body and Blood of the Lord are offered on an altar where this memorial is celebrated, there should be at least one white cloth, its shape, size, and decoration in keeping with the altar's design.**
It bugs me when I see an altar without the white cloth on it. I'm glad to finally find the canon reference.
Please notify me via FReepmail if you would like to be added to or taken off the Catholic Discussion Ping List.
While recently in another state, the Parish church that I attended had no permanent Crucifix ... nor did it have kneelers, any visible sign (such as a Sanctuary Lamp) indicating the placement of the Blessed Sacramentin the Tabernacle.
That sounds like a sad example of a Catholic Church!
I walked into a similar one about a year ago and remarked, "Oh, I guess I must be in a Protestant Church." I don't think the people from that parish liked it.
There were no stations of the Cross, no sanctuary light, no tabernacle, no images or statues, just wood in the round shape of the sanctuary. To me it was ugly.
OK, I'll jump in on this:
1. Our parish has just built a new church building. The exterior is brickface, and has a bell tower (not a steeple) on top of the roof. The "bell tower" contains no bells and is for decoration only.
2. The interior has a central aisle, but the seating layout is in a semi-circular pattern. It is painted a blazing white, the only relief from which appears behind the altar. There is a crucifix affixed to the wall and some decorative painting representing lightbeams surrounds the crucifix. It looks nice. The stained glass isn't bad, though because of the semi-circular seating, you can't see much of it except from the back of the church.
3. The altar is three steps up from the congregation. There is no altar rail (of course). The altar itself is made of white marble, and is very nice. The decorating ladies do a nice job with the flowers, though I do wish they'd lose the fake ficus trees that line the back wall. The tabernacle is from the '60s, so it is very plain, but is finally back where it belongs: front and center and easily seen by all. A very plain (no lace) white altar cloth is used.
4. The choir (oops! "music ministry") is unfortunately seated all the way up front and to the left of the altar. What is even more unfortunate is that because of the VERY low ceilings, the acoustics stink. But that's OK, 'cause there are plenty of microphones hanging over the choir. (SHEESH!)
5. The walls do contain the stations (also from the '60s), but there is NO other decoration on either the walls or the ceilings -- just vast expanses of white, white white. Christopher Lowell would have a heart attack with all the undecorated white walls!
6. The Blessed Mother and St. Joseph are tucked away in the corners surrounded by those infernal fake "candles." The statues themselves aren't too bad.
7. In the vestibule, there is a very nice, very old (from before the parish even HAD a church building) statue of our patron, Saint Patrick. Holy water fonts are located here in the vestibule (none in the church itself).
8. There are no confessional booths, only "reconciliation rooms," and the rooms have clear glass doors!
Anyway, that's my church. Over the summer I'm going to do some work on making a few tapestries. Maybe they will accept them, and maybe not. If not, I'll donate them to a convent or something.
Regards,
PS: They had to make one adjustment to the interior design. It seems that the sprinkler system was just a leeeetle bit too sensitive, because the first time they used incense for a funeral, the mourners were...well...sprinkled. The problem has been fixed, now, though.
My parish church (the one I actually belong to, not the one where I live) IS distracting in and of itself due to the images everywhere. Since it's the cathedral, exceptions must be made. The ceiling is mosaics, acres and acres, scenes from the Bible and the history of the church in the US. The west transcept is from tomorrow's gospel (this will be used in the homily as a visual aid). Take a look.
http://www.cathedralstl.org/tourism/tour.html
From the article posted above, they do everything by the book, unlike the parish I left which had a thing for creativity. The church there was wreckovated (the people don't realize it) and all of the features that made Catholic disappeared. At least one saint's statue and the confessionals were eliminated in favor of a "reconciliation room". Ick.
**Over the summer I'm going to do some work on making a few tapestries. Maybe they will accept them, and maybe not. If not, I'll donate them to a convent or something.**
Or you could always donate it a home for unwed mothers for a raffle fund-raiser or something like that.
**They had to make one adjustment to the interior design. It seems that the sprinkler system was just a leeeetle bit too sensitive, because the first time they used incense for a funeral, the mourners were...well...sprinkled. The problem has been fixed, now, though.**
Baptism by incense? LOL!
Too bad I couldn't have visited it when I was there!
LOL...I know, it seems funny now, but I'm sure it was just disasterous to the mourners (except my family; we would have laughed like hyenas at the humor of it -- we're pretty good at gallows humor.)
Regards,
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.