Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Catholic Factor 2004 [presidential Election -- Bush vs. Kerry on abortion]
Catholic Exchange ^ | 3-13-04 | Ken ConCannon

Posted on 03/14/2004 3:55:56 PM PST by Salvation

Catholic Factor 2004
03/13/04


I fully expect that during this election season we will hear much about our country’s so-called time-honored tradition of the "separation of church and state." Much of it will come from pro-choice Catholic politicians who will argue, as they always argue, that while they are personally opposed to abortion, they don’t believe that they have the right to impose their religious or moral views on their constituents, many of whom do not share the Catholic Church’s views on abortion.

I expect that the "separation of church and state" mantra will be louder than in previous elections for two reasons. First, the presidential election this year will most likely be between a socially conservative, pro-life president, George W. Bush, and a liberal, pro-choice Catholic contender, Senator John Kerry of Massachusetts. Feared by the abortion industry before he was elected president in 2000, and even more after he was elected, Bush has proven himself to be the most pro-life president since issuance of the Roe and Doe decisions 31 years ago. Feminist Gloria Steinem, no friend of the unborn, described the Bush administration thusly: "To my knowledge, there has never been an administration that has been more hostile...to reproductive freedom as a fundamental human right, and has acted on that hostility."

The Catholic Kerry, on the other hand, is a devout disciple of the abortion agenda. Kate Michelman, president of NARAL Pro-Choice America, attested to his devotion in an interview with the New York Times: "Even on the most difficult issues [e.g. partial birth abortion] we’ve never had to worry about John Kerry’s position." Since 1995, NARAL has given Kerry a 100 percent rating for his voting record in support of the abortion industry.

The second reason is the increasing willingness of some Catholic bishops to both privately and publicly confront pro-choice Catholic politicians who are members of their diocese. About a year ago Bishop Robert Carlson of the Diocese of Sioux Falls, S.D., where pro-abortion Catholic Senator Tom Daschle supposedly worships, asked Daschle to stop advertising himself as a Catholic in his Congressional biography and campaign material. More recently Bishop Raymond Burke of the Diocese of La Crosse, Wisconsin, told three pro-abortion Catholic politicians that they should stay away from the Eucharist. And Archbishop Sean O’Malley of the Archdiocese of Boston, where there are several pro-abortion Catholic politicians, has instructed those politicians to refrain from receiving Communion. Senator Kerry is a member of that diocese.


When Senator Kerry is nominated by the Democratic Party, as expected, he will be only the third Catholic nominated for the presidency by one of the two major political parties in the history of our country, and the authoritative nature of his Catholic religion will become fodder for liberal interest groups and commentators who consider themselves guardians of the "separation of church and state" flame. To these people the authority of the Catholic Church and its opposition to the relativism that is their only moral guidepost is frightening.

The two previous Catholic nominees, Al Smith in 1928 and John Kennedy in 1960, encountered serious anti-Catholic bias emanating from a suspicion that a Catholic president would yield his presidential decision-making authority to the pope in Rome. During the 1928 campaign the Ku Klux Klan burned crosses and circulated a ridiculous rumor that Smith favored building a tunnel between the White House and the Vatican. Smith lost by a large margin to his Protestant opponent. And Kennedy, a young, good-looking, charismatic war hero, barely eked out a victory after explaining to a televised assemblage of Baptist ministers in Texas that, if elected, his Catholic faith would not prevent him from acting in the best interests of the country.

Abortion wasn’t a political issue when Smith and Kennedy ran for office, and both were considered at the time to be practicing Catholics in good standing with their Church. Consequently, the anti-Catholicism of the day was directed at them and their right, as Catholics, to serve as President.

But abortion has been a major political issue for the past thirty years, one that should trump other issues for Catholics and others who believe the state has an obligation to protect innocent human life. Senator Kerry, who, through his actions, defines himself as something other than a Catholic in good standing, will not be the target of the anti-Catholic bias that his predecessors were. But his Church will be.


Concannon is a freelance writer from All Saints Parish in Manassas.

(This article courtesy of the Arlington Catholic Herald.)




TOPICS: Activism; Apologetics; Catholic; Charismatic Christian; Current Events; Eastern Religions; Ecumenism; Evangelical Christian; General Discusssion; History; Humor; Islam; Judaism; Mainline Protestant; Ministry/Outreach; Moral Issues; Orthodox Christian; Other Christian; Other non-Christian; Prayer; Religion & Culture; Religion & Politics; Religion & Science; Skeptics/Seekers; Theology; Worship
KEYWORDS: 2004; abortion; bush; catholiclist; catholics; kerry; presidency; vote
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last
Kerry will meet staunch Catholic opposition!
1 posted on 03/14/2004 3:55:58 PM PST by Salvation
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: *Catholic_list; father_elijah; nickcarraway; SMEDLEYBUTLER; Siobhan; Lady In Blue; attagirl; ...
Catholic Discussion Ping!

Please notify me via Freepmail if you would like to be added to or removed from the Catholic Discussion Ping list.

2 posted on 03/14/2004 4:10:32 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cpforlife.org; Coleus; little jeremiah; PhiKapMom
Pleasae ping your lists.
3 posted on 03/14/2004 4:11:47 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Please
4 posted on 03/14/2004 4:12:17 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
>> Kerry will meet staunch Catholic opposition!

Why so you think so? There is an opportunity right now for Catholics to voice their opposition to Kerry and his agenda but it clearly isn't happening. For instance, where was the criticism on Ash Wednesday when Kerry used it as a photo op?
5 posted on 03/14/2004 4:21:31 PM PST by cebadams (much better than ezra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cebadams
You didn't read mine, eh?
6 posted on 03/14/2004 4:22:52 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: cebadams
I don't think Kerry has been out of the Church's dart-board focus:

The Deadly Dozen

Blood On Their Hands: Exposing Pro-abortion Catholic Politicians

Kerry [Catholic} says he'll filibuster Supreme Court nominees who do not support abortion rights

PETITION TO EX-COMMUNICATE PRO-ABORTION CATHOLIC ELECTED OFFICIALS

Catholics Kerry and Kennedy have a 100% Pro-homosexual Record with the Human Rights Campaign! Page 10,11

Kerry says he alone hasn't 'played games' on abortion

AS KERRY EMERGES, SO DOES CONCERN THAT AS PRESIDENT HE MAY BE DENIED COMMUNION

Archbishop [Raymond Burke] Would Refuse Communion To John Kerry

Kerry raps Pope: Senator fuming over gay marriage order

(re Kerry & Kennedy) Boston Bishop O'Malley Says "It Is Not Our Policy To Deny Communion"

Catholics Attack Kerry on Abortion Stance

KERRY & GAY MARRIAGE

Kerry tells off the Pope

Kerry dodges constitutional ban question (Gay Marriage)

Kerry Signed Letter Endorsing Homosexual Marriage

Kerry Signed Letter Backing Gay Marriage

John Kerry: A Call To Service Excerpt (on being a practicing Catholic)

Well,well,well!["Catholics for Kerry" leader works for United States Conference of Catholic Bishops]

7 posted on 03/14/2004 4:24:20 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
I have never voted for a Democrat since they have aligned themselves with the pro-murderers long ago, but I have to laugh at Kerry. Almost as if you want to say to the Democratic Party - this guy is the best you could come up with?
8 posted on 03/14/2004 4:36:41 PM PST by Gerish (Do not be fearful. God is with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Separation of church and state is false and has been condemned many times by the Church.

55. The Church ought to be separated from the State, and the State from the Church.—Allocution 'Acerbissimum,' Sept. 27, 1852.
56. Moral laws do not stand in need of the divine sanction, and it is not at all necessary that human laws should be made conformable to the laws of nature and receive their power of binding from God.—Allocution 'Maxima quidem,' June 9, 1862.
57. The science of philosophical things and morals and also civil laws may and ought to keep aloof from divine and ecclesiastical authority.—Ibid.
-- Pope Bl. Pius IX, The Syllabus of Errors

Since, then, no one is allowed to be remiss in the service due to God, and since the chief duty of all men is to cling to religion in both its reaching and practice-not such religion as they may have a preference for, but the religion which God enjoins, and which certain and most clear marks show to be the only one true religion -it is a public crime to act as though there were no God.
-- Pope Leo XIII, Encyclical "Immortale Dei"

That the State must be separated from the Church is a thesis absolutely false, a most pernicious error. Based, as it is, on the principle that the State must not recognize any religious cult, it is in the first place guilty of a great injustice to God...Hence the Roman Pontiffs have never ceased, as circumstances required, to refute and condemn the doctrine of the separation of Church and State.
-- Pope St. Pius X, Encyclical "Vehementer nos"

It would be a grave error, on the other hand, to say that Christ has no authority whatever in civil affairs, since, by virtue of the absolute empire over all creatures committed to him by the Father, all things are in his power.
-- Pope Pius XI, Encyclical "Quas Primas"

O Christ, that Heads of State may honor Thee publicly, that professors and judges honor Thee, that Thou be manifest in laws and the arts!
-- Vespers Hymn of Christ the King

Therefore it leaves untouched traditional Catholic doctrine on the moral duty of ... societies toward the true religion and toward the one Church of Christ.
-- Vatican II, Declaration "Dignitatis Humanae"
9 posted on 03/14/2004 4:44:50 PM PST by gbcdoj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gbcdoj
Welcome to FR, newbie!
10 posted on 03/14/2004 4:47:19 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Great list. But let's look at your list a bit -- Kerry clearly publicly exposes all sorts of anti-Catholic positions. His pronoucements clearly bring scandal to the Church. So where is the outrage? Burke would deny him communion, O'Mally would not. That appears to be it.
11 posted on 03/14/2004 4:59:08 PM PST by cebadams (much better than ezra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: cebadams; american colleen; NYer; Desdemona; sandyeggo
I think that's where we are with O'Malley right now. Pinging american colleen to get her input from the Boston Diocese.

We also have the bishop in South Dakota asking Daschle to stop taking Communion. Also Bruskewitz of Lincoln Diocese in Nebraska has spoken out on this. I know because my brother lives there.

There are a couple of other bishops who are stepping up to the plate too.

Can any of you help me with additional bishops, here?
12 posted on 03/14/2004 5:02:52 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Sal, that's wishful thinking. There are too many Catholics whose "daddy" voted Democrat, and they, therefore, will vote Democrat.

My mother, God rest her soul, voted Democrat to the day she died, in 1991.

She would have voted for Clinton, without question.

Some Catholics hold voting Democrat to be more sacred than Church teaching.

13 posted on 03/14/2004 5:10:52 PM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a dog or a cat from an animal shelter! It will save one life, and may save two.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur; formerDem
So are you saying that you also vote Democrat? I doubt it because you wouldn't be here if that were the case.

Sometimes we learn/change in our journeys, correct?

For instance there are several screenames:
formerDem comes to mind.
14 posted on 03/14/2004 5:16:40 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Interesting read over here:
Like the 2000 presidential election, the Catholic vote will be up for grabs in 2004. An October 2002, Catholics for a Free Choice (CFFC) report maintained that Catholic voters were increasingly independent minded, refusing to be identified with either the Democrats or Republicans. The report, entitled "Beyond the Spin," analyzed the voting patterns of Catholic voters -- who make up nearly 25% of the electorate -- and found that "Despite a convergence of concern for social justice and the value of the family, they show an increasing independence and volatility in voting."

Catholics "are most concerned about bread-and-butter issues of personal economic security [and] [t]hey are influenced more by what the candidates will do about preserving Social Security and Medicare, improving health care and education, and fighting crime, than by church-defined issues of morality," the report read. On three highly charged issues, the majority of Catholic voters stray from the Vatican's line: 80% support the death penalty, 66% percent support legal abortion, and 56% percent support the practice of allowing doctors to assist in the suicide of terminally ill patients.


15 posted on 03/14/2004 5:22:18 PM PST by cebadams (Amice, ad quid venisti?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Hi, Salvation.

[cont] The bishops ought to speak out against Catholic politicians who use "separation of church and state" to justify immoral activity and the lack of recognition of Christ's Church as the established religion of society(*). Having 3-4 bishops deny communion to some legislators who are the most egregious advocates of abortion is just not enough! The key issue here with legalized abortion, contraception (cf. H.V. §23), etc. is a denial of the Kingship of Christ on the part of many Catholics and other Christians, IMO.

(*) Of course, the establishment of the One, Holy, Roman, Catholic and Apostolic Church of Christ as the only religion of the State is now impractical in most countries, but that doesn't mean the principle is not still existent.
16 posted on 03/14/2004 5:28:11 PM PST by gbcdoj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Bishop Wiegand in CA told Gov. Gray Davis not to take Communion.

I am from the Boston Archdiocese, Bishop O'Malley seems like a pretty good bishop but I believe his most recent statement was that pro-abortion politicians should not dare to approach Holy Communion, but they'd be able to recieve anyway if they did. Better than most, who haven't really said anything on the issue at all.
17 posted on 03/14/2004 5:34:16 PM PST by gbcdoj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
"So are you saying that you also vote Democrat? I doubt it because you wouldn't be here if that were the case."

I drifted away from the church at about age 14. Had my "second conversion" in 1998. So, that is why I am a former democrat. I grew up hearing that the Republicans are for the rich and the democrats are for the poor. I vote for republicans now because I consider them the lesser of two evils.

18 posted on 03/14/2004 5:38:25 PM PST by formerDem (The academy heard the words, "The Return of The King" eleven times. Think they made the conncection?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
No. I've never voted Democrat in my life. But, some of these old-line Democrats never change, and WILL never change.
19 posted on 03/14/2004 5:38:53 PM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a dog or a cat from an animal shelter! It will save one life, and may save two.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: gbcdoj
Of course, the establishment of the One, Holy, Roman, Catholic and Apostolic Church of Christ as the only religion of the State is now impractical in most countries, but that doesn't mean the principle is not still existent.

I prefer the United States Constitution, which forbids the establishment of a state religion, Catholic or otherwise.

20 posted on 03/14/2004 5:45:13 PM PST by sinkspur (Adopt a dog or a cat from an animal shelter! It will save one life, and may save two.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson