[SAJ]

The MOST cost-effective, total cost/all costs paid, source of biomass would, without doubt, be the sundry liberal/Marxist/dirtbag lefties and their children. Why wouldn't a conservative ''like'' this source?

Granted, perhaps it would be more effective just to hold them captive and reprocess their feces, but that solution would lack a certain elegance, and besides, the taxpayer would be hung for the cost of their food in the interim.

[steve50]

The MOST cost-effective, total cost/all costs paid, source of biomass would, without doubt, be the sundry liberal/Marxist/dirtbag lefties and their children. Why wouldn't a conservative ''like'' this source?

Please don't bother posting such idiocy to me.