DEMOCRATS HAVE A LOT OF EXPLAINING TO DO

Republican National Committee ^ | October 10, 2003 | RNC Research

[deedgirl]

I was watching Cheney on fox giving his speech when they cut him out and put on a video of a car accident that happened in July and wanted people to help in the search, It was a shame that this accident occured but it did happen in July they could have waited after Cheney was done! Freepers must complain to Fox

[lainde]

Great summary PKM!

[davidosborne]

Hreat POST... BTTT... Adding to my website...Thanks !!

David

[ItsOurTimeNow]

I've also been increasingly more and more dissapointed of Fox's war coverage.

If there was ANY network I thought I could count on to report "Pro-Coalition" news, Fox was it.

They've gotten slightly better...but not a whole lot. They proved me wrong..

[metalboy]

Hey, he thinks the `rats are nasty now about Iraq, I can`t wait to get a load of what they`ll say when their hero Castro is 'bothered'. Anyone read this? Bush Seeks Ideas for Cuban Regime Change
Ho ho ho! I can`t wait! I can`t freggin` wait, because the `rats will be exposed for what they are, all by themselves opening their yaps. They think they lost Florida last time by a small margin, next election they`re gonna be so far behind in that state it might as well not even exist for them. Castro has been praised more times by the left than Bush himself could ever hope for, and I can`t freggin` wait for them to say it again. Sorry Fidel, this administration doesn`t kidnap kids.

[blackie]

Democrats are irrelevant!

[windchime]

Bump!

[Grampa Dave]

This will convince more moderates with a brain and a desire for the safety of their families to cross over to our side in November 2004.

[Wait4Truth]

As far as I'm concerned, the Fox News Channel has gone to the dark side. They couldn't take the heat over being called "conservative" and they have caved. It is also my belief that they used us all. They drew us in by appearing to be different, by appearing to be truly fair and balanced. However, they have now brought in many liberal anchors and the complete tone has changed. They sound a lot like CNN these days. For those on FR that continue to give their undying loyalty to Fox, I say you are being HAD. Don't look for Fox to be on the side of President Bush in 2004 or even give him a truly fair shot.

If I had my way, all freepers and all Republicans would turn off Fox for 30 days and see what the response would be. That will not happen, however, because too many are too busy saying "Fox rocks" or "Fox rules" to notice what has happened.

[MeekOneGOP]

The 'RATS never got the memo: When in a hole, the first rule is to STOP DIGGING !

The are STILL DIGGING their own graves, imho ...

They haven't a CLUE whatsoever ! Looking back at Election 2002, they thought that the problem was that they weren't FIRM ENOUGH AGAINST President Bush, so what did they do? They replaced Dick Gephardt with Nancy Pelosi ! Get someone who opposes President Bush with someone who opposes him MORE ... AND who is FARTHER OUT THERE IN LEFT FIELD !! Like I said, they haven't a CLUE !!

The Dirty 'RATS !

They think that they will be able to get someone into the White House by OPPOSING Bush on every front. They cannot come up with any viable plans or 'solutions', though. Just Bush-bashing, and opposing him on everything. After Election 2004 is over, the 'RAT carnage will will make Election 2002 look like a 'RAT Holiday ! ...

November, 2004:
President Bush on the Road to Victory ...

November 2004 (the SIXTEEN words):

The GOP gained seats in the House and the Senate.
Meantime, President Bush wins in landslide !

[sanjacjake]

The DemS..are the slowest learners on the planet....We
should all Encourage them to keep rolling out the Clintons,
Jesse, McCauliff, Pelosi, Boxer,etc..like they did here
for Mr. Personality, Grayout Davis....California just may
be the straw that breaks their back...Bush can take it out
here, especially after the LATimes, other media fell flat
on their a$$ trying to stop big Arnold. ROTFLMAO...jAKE

[gitmo]

[gitmo]

White House responds to rats BUMP.

[TexasCajun]

Finally something we can use from the RNC!

Who runs this again? Anybody seen him or her?

Why hasn't the RNC done more before now to combat the misinformation?

[Grampa Dave]

The leaders of the rats are classics when it comes to looking at insanity.

They keep doing the same things have failed them, over and over. When that fails they blame GW and the VRWCs. Then they go on doing what has failed and failed for them.

We can hope that their insanity and death grip on the rat party continues.

[Consort]

Until further notice:

• If it has an "R" after its name, vote for it.
• Yes, in politics, winning is everything.
• Republicans running against Democrats have earned your vote.
• Common sense trumps principles, morals, and conscience because even the bad guys have principles, morals, and conscience — but they don't resemble yours in any way, shape or form.

Requests for exceptions to the above must be submitted in writing, in triplicate, with adequate justification.

[davidosborne]

I know your comment was intended to be sarcastic.. however voting for the individual that MOST represents you, but has decided to work OUTSIDE of the two-party system does ALL conservatives a disservice.... it took me a LONG time to realize this...... I would rather elect an "R" that I disagree with on some issues than a "D".... we can bring the Republican Party to the right by supporting the MOST conservative "R" in the race in the PRIMARIES!! that is what the primaries are for.... in the CA case there was no primary so we had to just look at the numbers to see that McClintock did not stand a chance to win... If his numbers were better you can be sure he would have received the votes and NOT Arnold.....

[MeekOneGOP]

Yep !

Speaking of clintoon ... last year Ron Kirk, the ex-Dallas 'RAT mayor, ran for Texas Senate against John Cornyn, the GOP candidate. Right after Kirk locked up the 'RAT nomination, one of the FIRST things he did was to make it CLEAR that he did NOT want clintoon coming down here to 'help' campaign for him. I kept commenting during the campaign that I wish that Kirk would bring clintoon down here, lol ! Of course, it didn't matter anyway. Cornyn never was behind in the polls from day one, and won without a sweat !

John Cornyn-R, left, and Ron Kirk-D

Whoops ! It looks like the Ron Kirk link/site is DOA now ...

[Consort]

I know your comment was intended to be sarcastic..

Only semi-sarcastic because people who vote their conscience worry me. If a staunch pro-life Democrat is running for congress against a pro-choice Republican, conscience would dictate that the voter should vote for the pro-life Democrat, but common sense dictates that if the pro-life Democrat gets elected, his party would never allow him/her to introduce any pro-life legislation — no way, no how. He/she would have to follow the Liberal agenda.

[MeekOneGOP]

Yep ! One could write it all out, showing their failures and they still wouldn't get it I think ...