Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: churchillbuff; doug from upland
To be fair, Doug has posted that if Arnold does something like this in the Governor's office, Doug will be first in line calling for his ouster. But I don't understand why this behavior becomes disqualifying only when done while in public office? Does that mean women are fair game for groping in other settings?
39 posted on 10/06/2003 8:42:10 AM PDT by churchillbuff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: churchillbuff
The Democrats (along with a few Senate Republicans) established the principle that flaws in one's private life should not be considered barriers to holding public office.

I've come to the conclusion that we need to use this prinicple to hurt the Dems.
45 posted on 10/06/2003 8:44:18 AM PDT by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
This isn't Arnold first run for governor. He had an aborted run last time but nobody seems to remember why. This board has a collective memory loss.
47 posted on 10/06/2003 8:44:55 AM PDT by Rabid Dog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

To: churchillbuff
Repeat after me: A rape while a public official is not the same as a grope by a private citizen on a movie set.
214 posted on 10/06/2003 9:36:03 AM PDT by doug from upland (Why did DemocRATS allow a perjuring rapist to remain in the Oval Office?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson