1 posted on
10/05/2003 6:00:05 PM PDT by
kattracks
To: kattracks
President Bush justified his decision to invade Iraq citing the imminent threat posed by President Saddam Hussein's biological, chemical weapons and efforts to develop a nuclear bomb.Would these a-holes STOP LYING. Bush said specifically that the threat was NOT imminent; that it would be foolish to wait until the threat was imminent.
To: All
God Bless America! God Bless This Man!
|
|
Keep Our Republic Free
Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD AND SAY THANKS TO JIM ROBINSON! It is in the breaking news sidebar!
|
3 posted on
10/05/2003 6:04:13 PM PDT by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: kattracks
I don't really understand why CIA people would go on TV for an interview, and I don't understand why that CIA agents husband would publish his report in the OpED section of a newspaper.
5 posted on
10/05/2003 6:11:50 PM PDT by
LaraCroft
(Ping a ding ding)
To: kattracks
"President Bush justified his decision to invade Iraq citing the
imminent threat posed by President Saddam Hussein's biological, chemical weapons and efforts to develop a nuclear bomb."
I guess Reuters comes from the Clinton School of Journalism where they teach you that if a lie is repeated often enough it eventually becomes the truth. What Bush actually said was just the opposite: that we will no longer wait for an imminent threat before acting.
To: kattracks
*BUMP* !
11 posted on
10/05/2003 11:43:42 PM PDT by
ex-Texan
(Read Sun Tzu: The Cold War Never Ended)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson