Skip to comments.
Enquirer Held (Rush) Story for Two Years
Drudge ^
| Drudge
Posted on 10/03/2003 11:13:32 AM PDT by kevao
Meanwhile, the NATIONAL ENQUIRER is contemplating releasing on to the Internet audio tapes of Limbaugh made by his former housekeeper. The ENQUIRER carried allegations made by the housekeeper claiming Limbaugh bought prescription painkillers off the blackmarket.
The NATIONAL ENQUIRER held back reporting on Limbaugh for nearly two years, a publishing source tells the DRUDGE REPORT.
The tabloid's editors felt more confidence after police began an investigation.
Developing...
(Excerpt) Read more at drudgereport.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: rushlimbaugh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-132 next last
1
posted on
10/03/2003 11:13:32 AM PDT
by
kevao
To: kevao
This is looking more and more specious.
2
posted on
10/03/2003 11:18:56 AM PDT
by
EggsAckley
(..........................all my pings are belong to ......YOU.....................)
To: All
GOD BLESS OUR MILITARY
AND
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
|
|
Keep Our Republic Free
Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use
PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
|
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER and say THANKS to Jim Robinson!
IT'S IN THE BREAKING NEWS SIDEBAR
THANKS!
|
3
posted on
10/03/2003 11:20:05 AM PDT
by
Support Free Republic
(Your support keeps Free Republic going strong!)
To: EggsAckley
This is looking more and more specious Spacious? Suspicious?
4
posted on
10/03/2003 11:20:09 AM PDT
by
smith288
(Opinions expressed on this post are smith288s and not neccessarily those of Freerepublic.com)
To: EggsAckley
Uh...ain't sitting on the knowledge of a felony itself a felony?
To: NativeNewYorker
It's just an alleged felony at this point.
6
posted on
10/03/2003 11:21:40 AM PDT
by
kevao
(Fuques France!)
To: NativeNewYorker
No.
7
posted on
10/03/2003 11:21:54 AM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: EggsAckley
They probably held it two years ago because Rush went deaf two years ago. He'd probably garner mucho sympathy back then. Right now, he was already on the run because of the McNabb thing. Perfect time to lower the boom, if you're looking to destroy someone.
8
posted on
10/03/2003 11:22:20 AM PDT
by
ambrose
To: kevao
9
posted on
10/03/2003 11:22:21 AM PDT
by
jimbo123
To: kevao
Waiting for just the right moment to negate Rush's influence on the electorate.
10
posted on
10/03/2003 11:22:43 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(DEMS INHABIT A PARALLEL UNIVERSE)
To: OldFriend
We also need to remember that in this technologically advanced age, pictures and audio often aren't what they initially seem.
11
posted on
10/03/2003 11:24:03 AM PDT
by
Peach
(The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
To: kevao
They better watch it there credibility could sink lower than the NY Times!
12
posted on
10/03/2003 11:24:04 AM PDT
by
jazzo
To: smith288
spe·cious
(spshs)
adj.
1. Having the ring of truth or plausibility but actually fallacious: a specious argument.
2. Deceptively attractive.
To: Free State Four
touche`
Ill slink back into my trailer home. ;)
14
posted on
10/03/2003 11:25:41 AM PDT
by
smith288
(Opinions expressed on this post are smith288s and not neccessarily those of Freerepublic.com)
To: smith288
spe·cious
adj.
1. Having the ring of truth or plausibility but actually fallacious: a specious argument.
2. Deceptively attractive.
15
posted on
10/03/2003 11:25:43 AM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: Free State Four
You go to dictionary.com, too, I see.
16
posted on
10/03/2003 11:27:02 AM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: EggsAckley
Mr Kendall, (I can't remember his first name but David sounds right) better be very confident of his story. Limbaugh has the where with all to protect his reputation, and won't hesitate to do it!
To: ambrose
Yes, AND a perfect time due to the 2004 campaign.
18
posted on
10/03/2003 11:27:27 AM PDT
by
EggsAckley
(..........................all my pings are belong to ......YOU.....................)
To: Free State Four
Those definitions look specious to me.
19
posted on
10/03/2003 11:27:54 AM PDT
by
kevao
(Fuques France!)
To: smith288
Look it up at www.dictionary.com
spe·cious ( P ) Pronunciation Key (spshs) adj. Having the ring of truth or plausibility but actually
fallacious: a specious argument.
Deceptively attractive.
20
posted on
10/03/2003 11:28:41 AM PDT
by
EggsAckley
(..........................all my pings are belong to ......YOU.....................)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-132 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
