Set up? Anatomy of the contrived Wilson "scandal"

Multiple & linked in article | 10/2/03 | Wolfstar

[Wolfstar]

FReepers, the Left and it's media shills rely on what they believe is our stupidity. We're not supposed to be able to do this kind of research and piecing together of facts to uncover, if not the complete truth, certainly at good outline of it. So I urge you to read this material carefully and pass it on to as many news and information sources as you can. We CAN fight back.

[Support Free Republic]

LOOK! Another Freeper Just Gave To The Cause! WAY TO GO!
	We Salute Free Republic's Donors! Be one! Donate Here By Secure Server Or mail checks to FreeRepublic , LLC PO BOX 9771 FRESNO, CA 93794 or you can use PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com
STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD- It is in the breaking news sidebar!

[Mo1]

We CAN fight back.

Coorection ... We WILL fight back

[The_Victor]

Good Job! BTTT

[Wolfstar]

Ping — long, but it pieces much of the genesis of the phony Wilson scandal together.

[Consort]

Doesn't Novak, a supposed conservative, have the information that could help to end this now?

[Wolfstar]

Thanks. Took some digging, but the outline of the truth that this was a set up exists. Makes for a long article, but the laugh is on the Left, because they don't expect any of us in "the great unwashed masses" to take the time or effort to pull such info together. They also don't expect others of us to take the time to read and understand it.

[alwaysconservative]

Bump and thanks SO MUCH for posting this wonderful stuff!! I applaud you!

[Tacis]

This issue and the Rush situation provide a great warning for us! Willie's White House sewer dwellers, those you lied, fabricated, spun. mislead, and diverted over 8 years are still in business. They are like cornered rats, snarling at everything.

What we have here is a conspiracy to divert attention from dem corruption and negativeness by attacking the leaders and thinkers on the side of truth and light. The ultra-left wing, neocommunist media is happy to carry the messages.

Pick the leaders on our side. Bush, Cheney, Rush, are some already under attack. But others, Rice, Powell (yes, they'll even attack blacks who are not leftists), Clarence Thomas, lead senators and governors, industrail leaders and a very few folks in entertainment will take fire between now and national convention time. The dems can't advance their own issues or people and must blunt the influence of the good guys.

BTW, these are Willie's White House sewer dwellers. We know where Begala is, but where is Craig Livingstone and the other really nasty types that McAuliffe and the DNC use?

[Richard Axtell]

Excellent! Email this to every conservative pundit and reporter that you can think of. Be sure to include Michael Medved and Hugh Hewitt. Rush is going to be rather busy for the next few days. Man, what an all-out Democrat slime-assault we are witnessing, and this is just begining. We must continue to keep the truth above the ever-rising flood of muck and mire. The perpetrators do not deserve to survive their own desperation ploy, either.

[MizSterious]

Haven't finished it all yet, but Wolfstar, this is terrific work. I just have to comment though, that if a non-reporter using only regular internet resources can put all this together so well, why can't reporters with all the nexus-lexis kinds of resources get it right? Oh, that's just rhetorical. I do know why. Because they want to create a certain unfavorable impression. They have no interest in the truth, just in their agenda--getting a 'rat back into the Whitehouse.

[Chad Fairbanks]

Excellent summary - can I repost this in my blog (with full credit and linkage?)?

[MizSterious]

And Rove appears to be a particularly important target for their smears. In other words, all the people who could help the most to get GWB reelected.

[Wolfstar]

Of course you can use all of it or any part of it. Let's spread the word as far and wide as possible.

[LiteKeeper]

INTREP - print

[machman]

bttt for later

[geedee]

I normally don't read these types of threads. I look at the source and if it doesn't give one . . . I go on to the next thread.

I'm glad I didn't here. The research is great, the analysis even better, and this thread has really gotten me pumped.

Great job, wolf.

[geedee]

I normally don't read these types of threads. I look at the source and if it doesn't give one . . . I go on to the next thread.

I'm glad I didn't here. The research is great, the analysis even better, and this thread has really gotten me pumped.

Great job, wolf.

[Celtjew Libertarian]

Excellent work, which ties in with a few thoughts I'd had.

It also raises a few questions. The big one is whether Wilson's initial report on yellowcake reliable? The other question is if this has been a set-up to get the Bush administration, starting with Ms. Plame recommending her husband for the mission.

[Wolfstar]

I began my career as a reporter, although I moved into a different field some years ago. But it's what's at the heart of your rhetorical question that motivated me to do some digging. BTW, got to get ready for work, now, so need to sign off. I know this is a big news day because of what's going on with Rush, but I hope this important info doesn't get lost in the shuffle. We can't fight the Left if we are uninformed.