The question to which I was responding was Bustamamonte versus *Arnold*.
It looks like McClintock isn't going to win this. I think that's a shame, as I think he is the only person running who is capable of dealing with California's problems.
Between Bustamonte and Schwarzenegger -- which seems to be the contest -- I'd just as soon Bustamonte won. My logic on that is admittedly a bit perverse. It is sort of like, "If Californians won't elect McClintock, then the hell with them." Also, I don't see all that much difference between Bustamonte and Schwazenegger. One difference is that Bustamonte has some idea what he doing, whereas Schwarzenegger does not. I actually believe California would be better off with Bustamonte.
Imo, Diane Feinstein should be running, and McClintock is the person who should get elected. But that's not the way it's going.
It looks like California is in for some more years of hard times. That's too bad. It is such a pretty state. I enjoyed living there.
But if that is what they vote for, that is what they get.
I'll tell you what. If Californians want a celebrity to be their governor, they should go for Clint Eastwood. It's too late now, but he could handle it. He was mayor of Carmel, and he did a good job of that.