Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eva
>>>Yes Arnold is a liberal, a traditional liberal, but at least he's not a Socialist.

OMG. See folks, this is how the Arnoldnuts think. If there is a distinction between liberals and socialists, its marginal at best. Conservatives are out to defeat liberalism, not embrace it!

68 posted on 09/20/2003 3:57:38 PM PDT by Reagan Man (The few, the proud, the conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: Reagan Man; Eva
On top of that, he IS a socialist. Watch him pander to the race-hustlers by opposing prop 54, or to the soccer moms with school spending.

CA needs someone to do some union busting on the teachers' unions like Reagan did with the air traffic controllers, not pour yet more money down that sinkhole of corruption and waste.

Arnold shows every sign of not having a clue what might be in store for him should he actually win.
75 posted on 09/20/2003 4:02:02 PM PDT by thoughtomator (Right Wing Crazy #5338526)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

To: Reagan Man
You are obviously uninformed if you don't know the difference between a liberal and a socialist. A liberal is some one who promotes individual rights of the common man, supports property rights and freedom of religion (not from religion). You know what a socialist is, just about the opposite.
96 posted on 09/20/2003 4:14:19 PM PDT by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson