To: Eva
>>>Yes Arnold is a liberal, a traditional liberal, but at least he's not a Socialist.OMG. See folks, this is how the Arnoldnuts think. If there is a distinction between liberals and socialists, its marginal at best. Conservatives are out to defeat liberalism, not embrace it!
68 posted on
09/20/2003 3:57:38 PM PDT by
Reagan Man
(The few, the proud, the conservatives.)
To: Reagan Man; Eva
On top of that, he IS a socialist. Watch him pander to the race-hustlers by opposing prop 54, or to the soccer moms with school spending.
CA needs someone to do some union busting on the teachers' unions like Reagan did with the air traffic controllers, not pour yet more money down that sinkhole of corruption and waste.
Arnold shows every sign of not having a clue what might be in store for him should he actually win.
75 posted on
09/20/2003 4:02:02 PM PDT by
thoughtomator
(Right Wing Crazy #5338526)
To: Reagan Man
You are obviously uninformed if you don't know the difference between a liberal and a socialist. A liberal is some one who promotes individual rights of the common man, supports property rights and freedom of religion (not from religion). You know what a socialist is, just about the opposite.
96 posted on
09/20/2003 4:14:19 PM PDT by
Eva
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson