No, I'm not going to, and I'm lumping you in that category, as well--for all your whining about "weasel words," you sure seem to love using them, you self-admitted despicable piece of filth.
|
Posted on 09/19/2003 6:11:30 AM PDT by Dave S
Tom McClintock - The conscience of a conservative?
September 19, 2003
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- by Bob Chandra
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In recent days, Tom McClintock, the "other Republican" in California's recall race, has accepted a million dollars spent on his behalf by a left-wing special interest group. He has claimed that a Democrat victory in the recall election would be desirable, as it would better his chances in 2006. And he has joined with Democrat Cruz Bustamante in a boycott against fellow Republican, Arnold Schwarzenegger. This is the man we're supposed to believe represents the conscience of conservatism? At the end of the day, Tom McClintock's Faustian Pact with the Left has made one thing clear - it's all about Tom McClintock.
The $1 million to be spent on McClintock's behalf is by Indian gambling interests, a staunch Democratic special interest. I wrote about the possibility of left-wing special interests backing McClintock in order to divide Republicans several weeks back. Now it is a reality. The Sacramento Bee has announced that the Morongo tribe is spending $1 million to boost McClintock's candidacy and it's not because they want him to win. The money spent on McClintock is meant to split the Republican vote so their loyal servant, Democrat Cruz Bustamante, can emerge the winner. With enough left- wing money, McClintock can steal enough votes from Arnold to make that happen. Tom's win-at-any-cost mindset has him collaborating with leftist groups who want nothing more than a divided Right to throw the election to Bustamante. Does McClintock see that the Left is using him? Maybe there's a reason it's called "blind" ambition.
McClintock's partnership with the liberal special interests raises serious questions about his loyalty to the GOP. McClintock has said he puts his personal "principles" before the party. But there's a deeper reason McClintock doesn't care that his spoiler candidacy will doom Republicans in the recall race.
In a conversation with US Congressman Dan Burton, Tom McClintock said the following: he (McClintock) didn't mind it if Democrats win the gubernatorial race because it could improve his own chances in 2006. According to the Los Angeles Times, "Burton, one of the more conservative members of Congress, also said McClintock had seemed to suggest that it would be acceptable for a Democrat to hold the governor's office, because he might create a clamor for a Republican in 2006.". So that's what this is really about. If McClintock can't win, he can at least prevent the Republicans from winning so he has a better shot in 2006. Aren't we glad he's playing for our team?
McClintock is now collaborating with Cruz Bustamante to boycott the California Broadcasters Association's debate on the 24th as a means of showing up Arnold Schwarzenegger. Bustamante led the boycott charge on October 17th with McClintock soon followed his lead. When you see a Republican siding with a Democrat against a fellow Republican, you know something is wrong with the picture. Don't adjust your set- this is Tom McClintock, the self-styled conscience of conservatism.
As if things couldn't get any worse, McClintock is justifying his candidacy on a poll strategically conducted by the left-wing Los Angeles Times, which wants nothing more than to keep him in the race. That Times' poll has been debunked by Field and even invalidated by the Times' own reporting. It added 6% more self-identified conservatives than other polls and naturally gave McClintock an artificial 5% bump. But McClintock is clinging to this cooked poll, another leftist ploy, because it serves his interests.
What kind of a conservative lets left-wing interests drive his candidacy like this? The answer is a candidate who is so blind with ambition that he does not see how the Left is using him to their own ends. Thus far, McClintock has claimed he stands for principle, but it is obvious that his hopeless candidacy is based on personal ambition. It's no longer appropriate to view McClintock as merely a misguided crusader. He is a bigger threat to Republican victory on Election Day than Cruz Bustamante. Up until now, McClintock has responded to arguments for stepping aside with denial, delusion, and arrogance. Given his collaboration with the Left, Republicans must get serious with him. McClintock's "stalking horse" candidacy must come to an end.
Bob Chandra
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bob Chandra is a Bay Area Republican activist. He was involved as a strategist for Linda Rae Hermann's campaign against Mike Honda for California's 15th congressional district, and he currently serves as a commissioner for the Saratoga library. His email address is bobchandra(at)comcast.net.
My personal political philosophy does not fit 100% with either movement conservatives or moderates, although I certainly lean more to the former side. I guess I consider myself a Constitutional conservative, i.e, one who tries to conserve the original Constitutional. I was initially against the recall because (1) it came so soon after the election, (2) I didn't trust Issa's motives, and (3) the Founders were opposed to exercises in direct democracy such as this. Once it became certified, however, I became open to any Republican candidate who could win my confidence, and was most definitely open to McClintock initially since his positions most closely fit with my own. However, as the campaign has worn on, I have increasingly come to dislike and distrust the man, himself. So far, not a single one of McClintock's strident supporters on this forum has attempted to win me over to his side by addressing the concerns I have about the man, himself, not his political positions.
No, I'm not going to, and I'm lumping you in that category, as well--for all your whining about "weasel words," you sure seem to love using them, you self-admitted despicable piece of filth.
|
Doughty to be honest, I always thought that hell would freeze over before I would see from you the above italicized statment.
JMO, you have stepped into the door of true Reagan Republicanism.
Welcome home.
Pot. Kettle. Black.
Foxtrot Oscar.
Yeah, right.
Are you blind, stupid, or both?
Wow! But it's OK to work with a party that's filled with hard-Left Marxists who — if they had no opposition — would confiscate everything you own, do away with private property, turn our Constitution into little more than toilet paper, give away our national sovereignty and subjugate us to a globalist government seated at the UN, and otherwise force us all into a Marxist utopia which would be a hell on earth? They would do away with traditional marriage and provide free abortions on demand. Sometimes I'm shocked at how truly blind some movement conservatives are to their real enemy. The Republican Party sure isn't perfect by any means, but it is the only thing standing between us and that Marxist vision.
He was in the race before Arnold and he's a real conservative. With Arnold, all the Republicans will get is blame for the condition of the state when his term is up. He won't accomplish anything in office. And he has nothing substantive to talk about, so he can't even use the bully pulpit for anything constructive.
How soon after these other consevatives entered the race did McClintock enter the race? If he was a latecomer, then he'll die by the sword and deserve it. Otherwise, we have a contest between a Conservative and a CINO. Where's the difficulty?
Again, what will be gained by electing Arnold?
Right on! Not even for dogcatcher!
Now, Poohbah, before you can ask this charming person how it feels to be a "looser," you first need to politely suggest that he or she should learn to spell the word. "Loose" is the opposite of "tight." "Lose" is the opposite of "win." [wink]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.