Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BMiles2112
Also, the price of the product would likely go down, offsetting the deflationary effect of lower wages earned by its employees.

This is known as 'deflation', and -- while I am not an economist, I've had a few courses -- is extremely destructive to modern economies. Cash hoarding begins to occur, as cash becomes more valuable by the day. People tend not to spend valuable cash. The concept of interest on loans is negated -- people can simply borrow money that becomes more valuable by the day. Lenders won't lend.

You are hoping for a scenario that would pretty much ruin the country.

Second, given the option of working for less or not working at all, which would you choose?

*sneer* That's a hell of a choice. Lose your left leg, or only your left foot.

59 posted on 09/17/2003 8:51:23 AM PDT by Lazamataz (I am the extended middle finger in the fist of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]


To: Lazamataz
....You are hoping for a scenario that would pretty much ruin the country.
You are right about the effects of deflation, but I am not hoping for it. I am proposing an alternative to having the job move overseas. Also, the scenario you present is an extreme example of deflation. Would inflation, caused by the imposition of tariffs on the goods produced, be better?

That's a hell of a choice. Lose your left leg, or only your left foot.
And life's not fair. And the poor little old lady living only off social security because she chose not to plan for retirement has to choose between medicine and food. *sob*. $35,000 a year is enough to live off. I promise.

68 posted on 09/17/2003 9:12:31 AM PDT by BMiles2112
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson