Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Washington Post corrects Cheney article from MTP appearance
Washingtonpost ^ | 09/16/03 | corrections

Posted on 09/16/2003 9:35:53 PM PDT by Pikamax

CORRECTIONS Tuesday, September 16, 2003; Page A02 A Sept. 15 article on Vice President Cheney's appearance on NBC's "Meet the Press" mischaracterized the vice president's response to a question about releasing information on Saudi Arabia's ties to al Qaeda and the Sept. 11 hijackers. The article quoted Cheney as saying, "I don't want to speculate" about the ties, and said that the vice president went on to say that Sept. 11 is "over with now, it's done, it's history and we can put it behind us." The article implied that Cheney agreed with this point of view. In fact, in his full remarks, the vice president took the opposite view and argued that it is important, in discussing alleged Saudi connections to the hijackers, not to release information that would jeopardize the United States' ability to fight terrorism.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia
KEYWORDS: cheney; cheneymisquote; correction; media; mediabias; misquotes; mtp; washingtonpost; wp
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: Coop
What about the Niger "yellowcake" connection? Which turned out to be wrong. Not that I have a problem with that. What upsets me is that with Iraq we can play fast and loose, but mention the Saudis.... This admin litterally suppresses information whch might actually be true.
21 posted on 09/17/2003 8:44:55 AM PDT by jd777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: jd777
What about the Niger "yellowcake" connection? Which turned out to be wrong.

Wrong! You really need to do some more reading.

22 posted on 09/17/2003 8:56:23 AM PDT by Coop (God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Coop
Pardon me, but the administration itself admitted that report was "incorrect".
23 posted on 09/17/2003 10:22:31 AM PDT by jd777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Any story by Dana Milbank about Presient Bush or the administration in general should automatically be assumed to be a lie. Milbank is a poisonous anti-Bush type and has been from the very beginning...see Bill Sammon's book Fighting Back.

Article bookmarked for the next time someone on FR goes nuts over a Washington Compost article filled with unamed sources and conservative base dividing innuendo.

24 posted on 09/17/2003 10:30:11 AM PDT by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Coop
Read this: (regarding july 7 statemets by ari fleisher)

Fleischer Says Bush Did Not Have Facts On Niger Uranium Before Sou Address

President Bush did not know, Fleischer said, that British information indicating Iraq had received uranium from Niger was wrong before he gave his January 28, 2003, State of the Union Address in which he said, "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."

Fleischer was responding to questions about a July 6 op-ed article in the New York Times by former U.S. Ambassador to Gabon Joseph Wilson, who also was interviewed July 6 on NBC's "Meet the Press."

Wilson, a career diplomat who served in the U.S. foreign service from 1976 to 1998, was asked by the Central Intelligence Agency to investigate reports that Niger sold Iraq processed uranium in the 1990s that could be used to make nuclear weapons.

Wilson traveled to Niger in February 2002 to investigate purported sale uranium yellowcake -- a form of lightly processed ore -- from Niger to Iraq in the late 1990s. Through further processing of the yellow granular solid, yellowcake can be used in fuel rods for nuclear reactors or in nuclear weapons. Niger is the world's third-largest producer of mined uranium.

"He [Wilson] is saying that surely the vice president must have known, or that the White House must have known, [about his conclusion] but that's not the case prior to the State of the Union," Fleischer said.

In his op-ed piece, Wilson said, "It did not take long to conclude that it was highly doubtful that any such transaction had ever taken place." Wilson also said that the office of Vice President Dick Cheney asked the CIA if Niger had sold uranium to Iraq. Wilson said his negative answer was given months before Bush announced in his State of the Union Address that Saddam Hussein sought uranium from Africa.

"The vice president's office asked a serious question," Wilson said. "I was asked to help formulate the answer. I did so, and I have every confidence that the answer I provided was circulated to the appropriate officials within our government."

Fleischer said the vice president's office knew nothing of Wilson's trip to Niger until the media reported the story.

"The vice president's office did not request the mission to Niger," Fleischer said. "The vice president's office was not informed of his mission. He was not aware of Mr. Wilson's mission until recent press reports accounted for it."

It is now old news that the report saying Iraq acquired uranium yellowcake from Niger is false, Fleischer said, but "The information about the yellowcake and Niger was not specifically known prior to the State of the Union by the White House."

"We've acknowledged that the information turned out to be bogus involving the report on yellowcake," Fleischer said. "That's not new. Dr. Rice has said it repeatedly. I've said it repeatedly." Committees in the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives are investigating pre-war intelligence on Iraqi weapons of mass destruction.

25 posted on 09/17/2003 10:34:10 AM PDT by jd777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: jd777
Cheney and co didn't put out ANY questionable reports on Iraq, though Rice, Wolfowitz, Powell, Tenet and Bush were deliberately misquoted, quotes were falsely attributed, and quotes were pulled entirely out of context so often to as to make it appear so. The last attempt to hit the administration ended up with the BBC getting a seriously bloody nose for its false reporting, an old Carter appointee-turned US ambassador exposed as a nutjob, and a lot of American presstitutes exposed for what they are when they misquoted Bush's SOTU speech on Africa and Iraq.
26 posted on 09/17/2003 11:00:52 AM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jd777
Pardon me, but the administration itself admitted that report was "incorrect".

Really? Then you should have no problem providing confirmation of this.

27 posted on 09/17/2003 12:06:25 PM PDT by Coop (God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: jd777
"The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."

Ahh, yes. The famous 16 words from the President's SOTU address. You'll notice there's no mention of yellowcake. The above quote was and still is correct.

28 posted on 09/17/2003 12:08:10 PM PDT by Coop (God bless our troops!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Coop
Look: My real point, and the post's point, involves the Saudis. I don't care about Iraq. I'm glad we took Saddam out. My point is that when information was given out on Saddam, sorry, some of it proved incorrect. Hey, it happens, but it was not true. Now, when the congressional report comes out on 9.11 and the Saudis are mentioned, the admin classifies said material. Their grounds are that disclosure of Saudi involvement hurts our ability to fight a war on terror.

My question to all you good folks, what really hurts our ability to fight a war on terror, the truth or a lie?

29 posted on 09/17/2003 12:21:40 PM PDT by jd777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson