Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Poohbah
So what? You will formally RINOIZE and support, hmmmm, Tom Campbell? Brook Firestone? Zsa Zsa Huffandpuff? Maxine Waters after she turns GOP? The Hildebeast after a move to California and a party switch? If you will support Arniold, none of them should be unacceptable to you. You know that Arnold will be finished if he does not win this year. Frankly, in 2006, he will be finished if he DOES win this year. So will California.

Do you think that having a hissy fit over Bustamante will stave off the inevitable Latino majority in California? You had better learn social conservatism because the Latinos will not be interested in Muffy, Skipper, Mumsy, polo lessons or trust fund protection politics for a very long time to come.

In any event, you know that Arnold isn't goin to win. The divisions to prevent that are permanent.

124 posted on 09/10/2003 9:11:32 PM PDT by BlackElk (Lakota Nation never legalized abortion, except the post-natal kind for Custer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: BlackElk
In any event, you know that Arnold isn't goin to win.

Bookmarked for later self satisfaction bumping.

126 posted on 09/10/2003 9:17:39 PM PDT by PRND21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

To: BlackElk; Chancellor Palpatine; Tamsey; PhiKapMom
So what? You will formally RINOIZE and support, hmmmm, Tom Campbell?

If Bustamante wins and McClintock's vote tally is greater than the margin between Schwarzenegger and Bustamante, then I will work to send McClintock back to the private sector in 2004. If Schwarzenegger winds up getting fewer votes than McClintock, then I will commute every weekend from San Diego to Thousand Oaks to ensure that little Tommy McNasty loses the State Senate primary. When someone deliberately splits the vote in apparent collusion with Bustamante, including receiving large amounts of campaign cash from tribal gaming interests who've already endorsed Bustamante, one is allowed to question the man's true motives, and reward him accordingly.

You know that Arnold will be finished if he does not win this year.

Of course. He's not a professional politician, living on the public's dime for 20 years.

Frankly, in 2006, he will be finished if he DOES win this year. So will California.

If he wins, you'd better pray you're right, because otherwise you're going to look really f***ing stupid.

Do you think that having a hissy fit over Bustamante will stave off the inevitable Latino majority in California?

No, it won't. But Bustamante would be a disaster for this state. Of course, since you live in Illinois, you don't have to suffer the consequences of electing him. Talk is cheap, son.

You had better learn social conservatism because the Latinos will not be interested in Muffy, Skipper, Mumsy, polo lessons or trust fund protection politics for a very long time to come.

Wow. Class-warfare rhetoric from McClintock supporters? They prefer that a Democrat win, they pray for unconstitutional judicial fiat to delay the election, and they now start spouting liberal we-hate-the-rich rhetoric. This does *not* make them sound like they're actually conservative.

In any event, you know that Arnold isn't goin to win. The divisions to prevent that are permanent.

When Illinois manages to actually elect a conservative, we'll take your silly opinions under advisement out here.

133 posted on 09/10/2003 9:31:14 PM PDT by Poohbah (Hee Haw was supposed to be a television show...not the basis of a political movement...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson