[Quix]

I think he'd be a much safer bet in the Senate than as head of a State or anything else very large. I would not want him head of the Senate or any hazardous oversight committee.

There's just too many red flags about the persistent undercurrent from the nonverbal cues. Have seen enough of such political animals do enough damage.

Only his stated and seeming track record of values would make him kosher enough for me to accept into the Senate given the worrying nonverbals. A less conservative person would not make the grade . . . though I wonder . . . sometimes it's the "TRUE BELIEVERS" who are most rabid, irrational, narrow, rigid and megalomaniacal.

[Tamzee]

Thank you so much for all that... I really appreciate your experience in this area!

I'm going to be looking for you when it comes to future primaries, that type of insight and experience is invaluable :-) And can I Freepmail you when my daughters start dating??? LOL

His Senate run is a bridge to cross in the future, so I won't worry about it quite yet. I'm really curious what he's going to do when he loses this race, though, it might reveal a great deal more about his character, too.

Thanks again, you are most kind to share your perceptions :-)