Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Puke politics: Hugh Hewitt on Democratic lying, buffoonery in Calif. recall, beyond
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Wednesday, September 10, 2003 | Hugh Hewitt

Posted on 09/10/2003 6:56:00 AM PDT by JohnHuang2

The chairman of the Democratic National Committee, Terry McAuliffe, has to be paid at least in part by Republicans. His buffoonery never stops, and he never appears on national television without the GOP gaining ground in the public opinion wars.

Now he has an understudy, California Democratic Party Chairman Art Torres. Together, these two have set a level of performance for party hacks so low as to make all future occupants of their offices appear skilled beyond belief.

On Sunday's "Meet the Press" appearance, McAuliffe first admitted to routinely lying whenever he makes electoral predictions. His job is to say the Democrats are going to win, he said, no matter what the facts are in any particular race. This wonderful moment of candor for McAuliffe establishes what everyone has known for a long time – this Clinton-trained, Clinton-appointed talking head is a liar, and he's not even ashamed to admit it. Give him credit for telling the truth just this once. It will be a useful clip to save and play the next time he unleashes a parade of falsehoods.

McAuliffe followed up this stunning admission with a description of Arnold Schwarzenegger as pro-choice, pro-homosexual and anti-gun. Now why would a practiced partisan like McAuliffe bother to describe Arnold this way? Because he's counting on the Tombots to throw the California recall to Cruz Bustamante. Terry McAuliffe is counting on the die-hard McClintockistas to deliver the day to Cruz and the way left politics that Cruz represents.

Art Torres has been studying the Clinton-McAuliffe technique and, Friday last, he trotted it out on "Hardball with Chris Matthews," opposite of the almost invariably upbeat and courteous California Congressman David Dreier.

But Dreier was on the hunt for Torres' scalp Friday, and he got it with an assist from Matthews. Torres had labeled Arnold a "known sexual predator" earlier in the week, and neither Matthews or Dreier would let this scurrilous charge from a bottom-feeder pass, and credit to both of them for pressing the matter. Confronted with his shameful remarks, Torres could only filibuster and talk loudly over Dreier and past Matthews.

Both exchanged knowing looks that told the audience that Torres is part of the diseased hierarchy of the California Democratic Party – one that counts the hate-filled operative Bob Mulholland and the accent-attacking Gray Davis among its leadership. Torres just put on prime-time display his own brand of repugnant tactics, the sort which Democratic Attorney General Bill Lockyer – himself a screamer and a schemer – has branded "puke politics."

As Campaign 2004 gears up, the Democratic Party is deep into a swamp of hard-left politics and brass-knuckled machine tactics. Contrast these performances with the upbeat optimism of Arnold and the dignified call to continued resolve in the war against the terrorists issued by the president on Sunday night. It is a comparison that bodes very well for the center-right in California and across the country.

What McAuliffe and Torres are telling you is that neither of them, nor the party they represent, nor the eventual nominee of that party for the president can be trusted to tell the truth. Not in small things and most certainly not in large ones.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hughhewitt
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last
Wednesday, September 10, 2003

Quote of the Day by stuck_in_new_orleans

1 posted on 09/10/2003 6:56:01 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: xm177e2; mercy; Wait4Truth; hole_n_one; GretchenEE; Clinton's a rapist; buffyt; ladyinred; Angel; ..

Hugh Hewitt MEGA PING!!


2 posted on 09/10/2003 6:57:12 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Good morning, John!

BUMP!
3 posted on 09/10/2003 6:59:52 AM PDT by EllaMinnow (Never Forget.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: redlipstick
G'mornin' backatya, my friend :-)
4 posted on 09/10/2003 7:00:34 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2; Tamsey; Tempest; onyx; My2Cents; EggsAckley; Victoria Delsoul; kattracks; PhiKapMom; ...
Terry McAuliffe is counting on the die-hard McClintockistas to deliver the day to Cruz and the way left politics that Cruz represents.

As my just-turned-four-year-old would say, "Ayup, a-that's right."

It also is, I think, the undeniable fact the scorched-earthers here least like to have pointed out.

Dan

5 posted on 09/10/2003 7:02:18 AM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
HUGE Bump!!!
6 posted on 09/10/2003 7:02:57 AM PDT by EggsAckley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
"As my just-turned-four-year-old "

Happy Birthday to him or her from all of us here in FReeperland ;-)

7 posted on 09/10/2003 7:04:16 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
the diseased hierarchy of the California Democratic Party

My, Hugh certainly does have a way with words!!

8 posted on 09/10/2003 7:04:29 AM PDT by EggsAckley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley
I have yet to hear a bad word about McClintock from the mouths of Mulholland, Torres, or McAuliffe.

Either he's the greatest man who ever lived, or they're tryin' to yank our chains.
9 posted on 09/10/2003 7:07:23 AM PDT by EllaMinnow (Never Forget.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
I was inclined to support Arnold at first. However, I'm getting tired of hearing folks post that californians should vote without regard for their beliefs. To date, the only area Arnold might be in agreement with me is taxes - and his refusal to promise 'No New Taxes' makes me wonder on that.

If the only reason to vote for Arnold is that he isn't Buste, then perhaps the best vote is NO to recalling Davis. Or a vote for TM. Remember - no one knows who will actually turn out to vote. This is a strange election, and the polls cannot know who is going to vote vs who might vote if it isn't too inconvenient.

In any case, I wish someone would point out a POSITIVE reason to vote for Arnold. "He might not raise taxes" is a weak rallying cry!
10 posted on 09/10/2003 7:11:40 AM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
A definite "him"! Yes, Jonathan Jedidiah Phillips is one of the great joys of the Phillips house, and thank you!

He also is part of Birthday Month, as all six of us have our burthdays in September. (We have to stretch it a bit for Josiah, born on the 34th!)

Thanks again.

Dan
11 posted on 09/10/2003 7:12:49 AM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
Thanks for your candor, and I think I very much understand your feelings.

My simplest answer: is it better to get ZERO of the ten things you want done, done; or to get one of the ten things done?

Clearly the latter. And for me, Schwarzenegger will surely do MORE than one, though not nearly ten.

Otherwise, see this post of mine.

It isn't the decision I'd prefer to be making, by a long shot. But I've no problem about making it.

Dan

12 posted on 09/10/2003 7:16:07 AM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
Well,

Happy Birthday to Jonathan!

You must be one proud parent, friend.

13 posted on 09/10/2003 7:17:47 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne; doug from upland; ALOHA RONNIE; DLfromthedesert; PatiPie; flamefront; onyx; ...
"...McAuliffe followed up this stunning admission with a description of Arnold Schwarzenegger as pro-choice, pro-homosexual and anti-gun.

Now why would a practiced partisan like McAuliffe bother to describe Arnold this way?

Because he's counting on the Tombots to throw the California recall to Cruz Bustamante.
Terry McAuliffe is counting on the die-hard McClintockistas to deliver the day to Cruz and the way left politics that Cruz represents..." - Hugh Hewitt

See also:

Eyewitness News Exclusive Poll (McClintock at 16 percent)
KABC 7 Los Angeles ^ | 09/09/2003
Posted on 09/09/2003 10:22 PM PDT by kingu

According to our EXCLUSIVE EYEWITNESS NEWS POLL, Arnold Schwarzenegger is the frontrunner in the recall election.

The statewide poll found that 62 percent are in favor of removing Governor Davis. 37 percent believe he should stay.

Schwarzenegger leads the recall candidates with 39 percent, Lt. Governor Cruz Bustamante gets 29 percent, State Senator Tom Mcclintock, 16 percent, Peter Ueberroth, who has now dropped out, 6 percent, and Arianna Huffington, 3 percent...

-- snip --

To: kingu

09/10/2003
Schwarzenegger leads the recall candidates with 39 percent, Lt. Governor Cruz Bustamante gets 29 percent, State Senator Tom Mcclintock, 16 percent, Peter Ueberroth, who has now dropped out, 6 percent, and Arianna Huffington, 3 percent.
08/26/2003
Schwarzenegger leads the recall candidates with 45 percent, Lt. Governor Cruz Bustamante gets 29 percent, State Senator Tom Mcclintock, 11 percent, Peter Ueberroth, 6 percent, and Arianna Huffington, 3 percent.

Okay I don't know what the plus or minus on this is, so let's take it at face value.

In the last two weeks Schwarzenegger has lost 6%.  McClintock has gained 5%.  Bustamante is still at 29%.

On face value it appears that in four weeks we might expect Schwarzenegger will lose 12% and McClintock will gain 10% if current trends continue.  That will give Schwarzenegger 27% and McClintock 26%.

I can think of two groups who will be thrilled with this.

BTW:  The absentee vote goes into it's third day
in a little less than one hour.

36 posted on 09/09/2003 11:07 PM PDT by DoughtyOne

CLICK HERE for the rest of that thread
.

If you listen to Hugh Hewitt, or read his WND commentaries,
this PING list is for YOU!

Please post your comments, and BUMP!

(If you want OFF - or ON - my "Hugh Hewitt PING list" - please let me know)

14 posted on 09/10/2003 7:18:55 AM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Thanks, John. And yes, all my boys make me very proud, thakns be to God.

Dan

15 posted on 09/10/2003 7:20:46 AM PDT by BibChr ("...behold, they have rejected the word of the LORD, so what wisdom is in them?" [Jer. 8:9])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
I was inclined to support Arnold at first. However, I'm getting tired of hearing folks post that californians should vote without regard for their beliefs. To date, the only area Arnold might be in agreement with me is taxes - and his refusal to promise 'No New Taxes' makes me wonder on that.

If the only reason to vote for Arnold is that he isn't Buste, then perhaps the best vote is NO to recalling Davis...

Bite your tongue!
MANY of us plan to vote for Arnold to get rid of Bustamante AND Davis - and to start flushing the cancer of RAT control out of Sacramento.
Arnold is not on our side on MANY of the issues, but he is the only weapon in our current inventory to use to do this important job.
See also my Star Trek metaphor.
HERE is part on an OLD episode best applies to our current situation, IMHO, from Operation: Annihilate!:
The thing [Gray Davis] won't die,
even at temperatures and radiation
which would burn Spock and your nephew to ashes.
I can't accept that, Bones.
We've got 14 science labs aboard this ship.
The finest equipment and computers in the galaxy.
Captain ...
I understand your concern --
your affection for Spock,
the fact that your nephew
is the last survivor of your brother's family.

No, no, Bones.
There's more than two lives at stake here.
I cannot let it spread beyond this colony,
even if it means destroying
a million people down there.
Captain 's Log. Stardate 3289.8.
I am faced
with the most difficult decision of my life.
Unless we find a way to destroy the creatures
without killing their human hosts,
my command responsibilities
will force me to kill over a million people.
Gentlemen.
I regret I see no other choice, Captain.

We already know this thing has destroyed three civilizations.
Perhaps more.
I want it stopped, too,
but not at the cost of destroying a million people. [electing Bustamante to replace Davis]
Including myself, Doctor,
and Captain Kirk's young nephew.
Understandably upsetting,
but once it spreads past here,
there are dozens of colonies beyond
and billions of people.
If killing 5 people saves 10,
it's a bargain.
Is that your simple logic?

I will accept neither of those alternatives, gentlemen.
I cannot let this thing expand beyond this planet,
nor do I intend to kill a million people to stop it.
I want another answer.
I'm putting you gentlemen on the hot seat with me.
I want that third alternative.
Report.
Sorry, Jim. We've been over and over it,
made every conceivable test.
I therefore request permission to beam down to the planet's surface
and that your nephew accompany me.
Request denied.
Captain ...
I do not make this request lightly.
I do not know how much longer
I can hold out against the pain.
But I do know what the boy will go through
should he regain consciousness.
Request denied.

There must be another answer.
Something ...
in the sun ...
killed that thing
before the Denevan died.
All right.
All right.
We've tried ...heat,
radiation.
What other qualities or properties
does the sun have?
It exists physically.
It occupies space,
it has mass, therefore, gravity.
It converts matter to energy.
[Pulsing]
Jim, we've been through it and through it.
Radiation, heat ...
But one other thing you haven't mentioned.
It's bright.
It radiates a blinding light if you're close enough.
Nothing lethal about light.
Not to us. But down on the surface,
the creatures stayed in the shadows for the most part.
Suppose ... they weren't simply hiding.
Suppose they're sensitive to light,
light, like in a sun close up.
A possibility.
You can't move Deneva closer to the sun, Jim.
But you can move the sun's equivalent to Deneva!
Mr. Spock?
Yes. In essence it can be done --
a string of satellites around the planet
with burning trimagnesite and tritium.
[Sigh]

Well, I can rig a test cubicle in a bio lab,
put our specimen in it.
But I don't --
Good.
Let's get on it.
Your figures are, of course, accurate.
Of course.
The light of the sun
at the proximity where the Denevan declared himself free
was 1 million candles per square inch.
If this works,
the satellites we orbit will produce light of such intensity
that even someone in a closed, darkened area
will be affected by it.
Ready, Doctor.
Put on your masks.
Completed.
It worked!
We can do it.
What's the matter, Jim? We can do it!
It worked. In a lab.
With the creature exposed to everything we can give it.
But what about the people who are infected?
Well, I don't know. Maybe trial --
There's no time for maybes, Bones.
We need to know now.
But I'd have to put a --
Yes, we'd have to put someone who's infected under that light.
Do you have any idea of the risk?
We have to duplicate the conditions on the planet.
And Spock ...

Captain.
You'll need a host
for the next step in the test
to determine whether the creature
can be driven from the body.
I am the logical choice.
Do you know what 1-million candlelight per square inch
can do to your optic nerves?
There's no other way, Bones.
We have to duplicate the brilliance that existed
at the moment the Denevan declared himself freed.
All right. I'll rig up a protective pair of goggles.
There'll be none on the planet's surface, Doctor.
I agree completely.
Unfortunately, you're both right.
It's the only thing we can do.
All right, Mr. Spock.
Mr. Spock's the best first officer in the fleet.
Proceed.
Completed. [October 7]

Spock, are you all right?
The creature within me is gone.
[Gray Davis is recalled]
I am free of it ...
and the pain.
And I'm also
quite blind.
[Arnold Schwarzenegger is elected Governor]
An equitable trade, Doctor.
Thank you.


16 posted on 09/10/2003 7:26:28 AM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BibChr
Very welcome, amigo.
17 posted on 09/10/2003 7:29:49 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
My first choice is McClintock, but I will certainly not do anything that would help Davis stay in office, or elect Bustamante. The failed policies of the Democrats in office are the only reasons we are debating this, is it your wish for this to continue?
18 posted on 09/10/2003 7:30:29 AM PDT by woodyinscc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: woodyinscc
I guess I'm wondering what electing Arnold would change. I'm sure Arnold is more honest than Davis or Buste, and he might be less likely to raise taxes. But I keep waiting for Arnold to come out swinging for something I believe in. And I'm not hearing much.

Since I'm military and residing in the state against my wishes, I can't vote anyways...although I pay a ton of taxes to california. But if y'all want to convince McClintock supporters to vote for Arnold, you need to try something more positvie than, "He isn't as awful as Buste!"

See Dan's response above, and check out his link. It actually offers a few reasons FOR supporting Arnold. The McClintock supporters I meet aren't going to be swayed by, "Hold your nose and vote for Arnold". Nor will they be swayed by, "You idiots! What if Buste wins?" They might, however, be swayed by rational discussions on what (few) positive things can be said about Arnold.

If you want to blow off steam, feel free to call McClintock supporters idiots. If you want to change someone's mind, start thinking about reasons to vote FOR Arnold.
19 posted on 09/10/2003 8:03:26 AM PDT by Mr Rogers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Liz your favorite DNC liar, has admitted that he lies all the time.

This brings up my famous question, "When does a lunatic Libe lie?"

"On Sunday's "Meet the Press" appearance, McAuliffe first admitted to routinely lying whenever he makes electoral predictions. His job is to say the Democrats are going to win, he said, no matter what the facts are in any particular race. This wonderful moment of candor for McAuliffe establishes what everyone has known for a long time – this Clinton-trained, Clinton-appointed talking head is a liar, and he's not even ashamed to admit it. Give him credit for telling the truth just this once. It will be a useful clip to save and play the next time he unleashes a parade of falsehoods.


"McAuliffe followed up this stunning admission with a description of Arnold Schwarzenegger as pro-choice, pro-homosexual and anti-gun. Now why would a practiced partisan like McAuliffe bother to describe Arnold this way? Because he's counting on the Tombots to throw the California recall to Cruz Bustamante. Terry McAuliffe is counting on the die-hard McClintockistas to deliver the day to Cruz and the way left politics that Cruz represents.

20 posted on 09/10/2003 8:14:22 AM PDT by Grampa Dave (May our brave warriors kill all of the Islamokazis/facists/nazis to prevent future 9/11's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-42 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson