Skip to comments.
President Bush Addressed the Nation Sunday Night (text of speech)
Whitehouse.gov ^
| Sept 7, 2003
| George W Bush
Posted on 09/07/2003 6:16:49 PM PDT by ThePythonicCow
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
To: ThePythonicCow
Bump for tomorrow...
Thank you!
61
posted on
09/07/2003 11:22:38 PM PDT
by
dixiechick2000
(Back up my hard drive? How do I put it in reverse?)
Comment #62 Removed by Moderator
Comment #63 Removed by Moderator
To: Aunt Enna
Yes - faith is powerful. But essential. Without it, one cannot distinguish the faith that guides Bush to free millions from tyranny and push back terrorism from the streets of America, from the insane terrorism that drives radical islamists to kill and enslave millions.
As you have so nicely demonstrated just now.
Have you considered applying for disability?
Nevermind - don't bother - our liberal nanny welfare state would likely consider you the one of sound mind, and myself the one disabled.
Oh well.
Comment #65 Removed by Moderator
Comment #66 Removed by Moderator
To: Aunt Enna
There are some Bush bashing forums (( liberty post )) ... need some advice --- directions ?
67
posted on
09/08/2003 12:39:30 AM PDT
by
f.Christian
(evolution vs intelligent design ... science3000 ... designeduniverse.com --- * architecture * !)
To: Aunt Enna
Bush's foreign policy is not based on lies.
Quite the contrary. It is more based in truth than any other American foreign policy in recent memory, excepting perhaps Reagan's, and than the foreign policy of any other nation currently.
To: Aunt Enna
Bush's foreign policy is not based on lies.
Quite the contrary. It is more based in truth than any other American foreign policy in recent memory, excepting perhaps Reagan's, and than the foreign policy of any other nation currently.
God is not involved in ...
I doubt that you channel God any better than do I. And I'm a Damned Atheist. Though, to be fair to myself, one with a strong faith in a higher moral order.
Comment #70 Removed by Moderator
To: Aunt Enna
Calling someone a substantial liar, when they aren't, is bashing, not questioning.
To: dixiechick2000
You're welcome, dixiechick.
Too bad most of the rest of this thread degraded into a such a troll magnet, as someone so aptly stated it earlier.
Comment #73 Removed by Moderator
To: ThePythonicCow
This was a wonderful speech, but there is a saddening aspect to the context. There was nothing as to the facts presented that should not have already been well known to people of, and clearly reported in the press of, a free and liberal nation. There was nothing as to the attitudes and conclusions presented that should not already have been convened and promulgated by the intelligencia of such a nation.
The fact that the President had to give this speech only reminds me of the ceaseless and bilious activities of the illiberal traitors ensconced at all levels in this Republic.
74
posted on
09/08/2003 2:39:09 AM PDT
by
Stultis
To: Aunt Enna
God is not involved in foreign policy based on lies.Such as? [cue crickets]
And the aftereffects of Bush's war proves God's word, "Sow to the wind and you reap the whirlwind."
"Baghdad Bob"!? Why did the coalition give you a computer, and why did you choose a screenname like "Aunt Enna"? Have you decided yet on the offers between ABC News, CNN and the BBC? Inquiring minds want to know.
75
posted on
09/08/2003 2:45:05 AM PDT
by
Stultis
Comment #76 Removed by Moderator
To: ladyinred
You're obviously a relative newbie and don't understand this "inside freeper joke" about the second volume of the Starr Report. I suspect I could blow your credentials out of the water "dear" as a freeper veteran and Clinton hater. I must be getting old.
To: bulldogs
Who knows? I just know that everytime things go bad in Iraq the pro-war freepers who supported us getting into this mess, find someway to rationalize the failure. This striks me as yet another example.
To: Aunt Enna
And it struck me as curious, before the war, wmd's were talked about in the present and future tense(saddam had them and would use them), today's speech wmd's were in the past tense.That's because Saddam no longer controls Iraq and cannot wield them. It was not stated at all as if "long ago he had them".
79
posted on
09/08/2003 7:19:02 AM PDT
by
cyncooper
(God Bless the U.S.A.)
To: Aunt Enna
Come on, the truth has to stand for something. The war was sold to the American people based on the fact that Saddam had wmd's and if not stopped, he would use them on US. Yes, the truth stands for something. This president knows that. Some of us know that.
You adopt your pious air, but regard for the truth is clearly something you do not possess.
80
posted on
09/08/2003 7:22:00 AM PDT
by
cyncooper
(God Bless the U.S.A.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-98 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson