To: lelio
That detail makes it sound even more likely that he was not doing this willingly. It sounds like a spur of the moment comment from someone afraid that when he gave his "handler" less than the amount requested, he'd be in big trouble, and forced to go back -- either to that bank or a different one -- to get the rest. Nobody who's robbing a bank on their own steam is going to even THINK about going back to the same bank for more in the foreseeable future -- it's get the money and run.
To: GovernmentShrinker
Has there been any confirmation on the story in the last few days that he was carrying a concealed weapon? If he was carrying a concealed weapon, then I would tend to think he was acting under his own volition.
10 posted on
09/05/2003 9:28:14 AM PDT by
Alberta's Child
("To freedom, Alberta, horses . . . and women!")
To: GovernmentShrinker
< Nobody who's robbing a bank on their own steam is going to even THINK about going back to the same bank for more in the foreseeable future -- it's get the money and run. >
Gives me the opposite opinion. The guy was just a nut case.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson