[Mo1]

The suit charges that Terri was denied a guardian ad litem during most of the legal proceedings in which her husband sought to end her life and, the remainder of the time, suffered from "ineffective assistance of counsel, due process violations, and blatant conflict of interest with Terri's guardian, defendant Michael Schiavo," who is responsible for seeing that her legal interests are represented

I've said it before and I'll say it again .. Judge Greer needs to be brought up on ethic charges for denying Terri her constitutional rights

This is an OUTRAGE

[CindyDawg]

If even half of what they are reporting is true, it's scary. I do not understand the nurses comments though. As a nurse myself, I would have gathered witnesses and reported this to the state when it was occuring. My DON would have had an incident report under her door every morning and I would have had a copy of my nurses notes and the incident reports to protect myself. It doesn't add up. The CNA reports are strange too. She states she fed her jello without an order? Someone with a high risk for aspiration? Even with an order a speech therapist or nurse would be supervising. I think this lady needs an independant guardian and an investigation but these witness reports trouble me.

[kimmie7]

There was a GAL at one time, Richard Pearse, who was suddenly dismissed after filing his report in which he stated that it was his opinion that 1. Michael Schiavo was not a suitable guardian due to his standing to gain financially and 2. The possibility of rehabilitation for Terri was too great to advocate any kind of Exit Protocol.