Skip to comments.
(Michael) Moore alters "Bowling" DVD in response to criticism (& issues libel threat to his critics)
Spinsanity ^
| September 2, 2003
| Brendan Nyhan
Posted on 09/02/2003 12:33:12 AM PDT by Timesink
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
There are so many possible punchlines here ... why not pick your own?
1
posted on
09/02/2003 12:33:13 AM PDT
by
Timesink
To: Timesink
"Every fact in the film is true. Absolutely every fact in the film is true. And anybody who says otherwise is committing an act of libel."
Even that that "fact" isn't true. If it's said, it's slander.
2
posted on
09/02/2003 12:39:25 AM PDT
by
Sapper26
To: Timesink
Ahh...but did you catch Moore's liberal doublespeak?
"Every fact in the film is true. Absolutely every fact in the film is true."
Yes, I'm sure that every FACT is true; that's why they're called facts. But what he did not claim--what he CANNOT claim--is that the movie is factual. Taking a scripted concoction of propaganda and lies and sprinkling in a few true facts does not make a fictional movie into a documentary.
3
posted on
09/02/2003 12:44:32 AM PDT
by
SpyGuy
To: Timesink
Hmm...
"Every fact in the film is true. Absolutely every fact in the film is true. Including any facts I may have changed or even outright reversed at any point. And anybody who says otherwise is committing an act of libel. And anyone who criticizes me is a meanie. And I'll tell my mommy on them. "
I guess by Moore logic, I could claim this is an exact quote. And anyone who disagrees is engaged in libel....right?
To: Timesink
The left thinks the right is crazy. Where is the right's equivelent of Moore and Franken? I rest my case.
To: Sapper26; Timesink
It's not lying or making up things,it's " Paraphrasing"!
6
posted on
09/02/2003 12:49:33 AM PDT
by
MEG33
To: Timesink
"Every fact in the film is true. Absolutely every fact in the film is true. And anybody who says otherwise is committing an act of libel."Lies, and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them :)
7
posted on
09/02/2003 12:58:22 AM PDT
by
KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
("The Clintons have damaged our country. They have done it together, in unison." -- Peggy Noonan)
To: DoughtyOne
They're not crazy. Lib's are just 'passionate' when expressing their views.
8
posted on
09/02/2003 1:02:16 AM PDT
by
Sapper26
To: Timesink
Even the statement that there was "carpet bombing" that killed thousands upon thousands of civilians is a lie, though in fairness, Moore might never have heard the truth of that matter.
9
posted on
09/02/2003 1:08:47 AM PDT
by
dsc
To: Sapper26
"They're not crazy. Lib's are just 'passionate' when expressing their views." The Second Coming -- W. B. Yeats
Turning and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;
Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;
The best lack all convictions, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.
Surely some revelation is at hand;
Surely the Second Coming is at hand.
The Second Coming! Hardly are those words out
When a vast image out of Spiritus Mundi
Troubles my sight: somewhere in sands of the desert
A shape with lion body and the head of a man,
A gaze blank and pitiless as the sun,
Is moving its slow thighs, while all about it
Reel shadows of the indignant desert birds.
The darkness drops again; but now I know
That twenty centuries of stony sleep
Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,
And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?
10
posted on
09/02/2003 1:09:57 AM PDT
by
boris
(Education is always painful; pain is always educational.)
To: DoughtyOne
The left thinks the right is crazy. Where is the right's equivelent of Moore and Franken? I rest my case. Don't forget perinial Democrat presidential candidate Lyndon LaRouche
11
posted on
09/02/2003 1:12:30 AM PDT
by
weegee
To: Timesink
...filmmaker Michael Moore has altered a caption that he fictitiously inserted into a 1988 Bush-Quayle campaign commercial I wonder if the packaging will alert consumers that the movie has been altered from its theatrical (and Oscar winning) presentation. I won't hold my breath.
I wouldn't expect any DVD critics to take issue with this either. Only a few expressed slight outrage that the boos Hillary received at the Concert for NYC were overdubbed with cheers. This altered the views of the firemen and policemen gathered (the persons being thanked at the concert). Viacom should have edited the clip out altogether rather than to fake a historic moment.
12
posted on
09/02/2003 1:16:44 AM PDT
by
weegee
To: Timesink
13
posted on
09/02/2003 1:24:10 AM PDT
by
weegee
To: Timesink
Lumpy Reifenstahl wrote, "if I state something as a fact, I need the viewers to trust that those facts are correct" QUESTION AUTHORITY. If his research is above reproach he should not mind investigations into his work.
14
posted on
09/02/2003 1:27:07 AM PDT
by
weegee
To: Timesink
Somehow I doubt that Mr. Moron's bit of agitprop mentions that Albert Gore Junior was the first candidate to bring up Willie Horton (when he was competing for the Rat party nomination against Michael Dukakis).
15
posted on
09/02/2003 1:30:36 AM PDT
by
weegee
To: Timesink
Michael Milli Vanilli Moore - his mouth is movin' but nothing honest coming out.
16
posted on
09/02/2003 2:59:55 AM PDT
by
Tamzee
("Big government sounds too much like sluggish socialism."......Arnold Schwarzenegger)
To: Timesink
Here are my thoughts.
MIchael Moore can threaten to sue all he wants but no civil judgment against anyone is going to change the reality that everything in this movie is a bald-faced lie. Now that's just all there is to it and he needs to learn to accept that he is simply not entitled to his own set of "facts."
17
posted on
09/02/2003 3:59:00 AM PDT
by
E.G.C.
To: E.G.C.
MIchael Moore can threaten to sue all he wants but no civil judgment against anyone is going to change the reality that everything in this movie is a bald-faced lie. Now that's just all there is to it and he needs to learn to accept that he is simply not entitled to his own set of "facts." Someone with time and money should take Moore up on his threat. It would be gratifying to see him have to defend the "facts" in his movie in a court of law. But, of course, like everything he does, the threat is just bluster. He'd never give his critics the chance to evicerate him like that.
18
posted on
09/02/2003 4:28:59 AM PDT
by
TomB
To: TomB
Excellent point. BTTT!!!!!
19
posted on
09/02/2003 5:04:14 AM PDT
by
E.G.C.
To: Timesink
bump for future reference
20
posted on
09/02/2003 7:02:12 AM PDT
by
finnman69
(!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson